Kahn v. Dean & Fulkerson, P. C., 533 U.S. 916 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Kahn v. Dean & Fulkerson, P. C., 533 U.S. 916 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Allen v. School Bd. for Santa Rosa County, Fla. (flnd, 2011-03-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Allen v. School Bd. for Santa Rosa County, Fla.
N.D. Fla. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chandler v. Siegelman, 230 F.3d 1313, 1317 (11th Cir.2000) (stating “[p]rivate speech endorsing religion is constitutionally protected — even in school”), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 916 , 121 S.Ct. 2521 , 150 L.Ed.2d 694 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rybicki
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lerman v. Bd. of Elections of New York, 232 F.3d 135 , 144 n. 10 (2d Cir.2000) ("It is not even clear that Salerno 's `no set of circumstances' test articulates an exclusive standard for making facial challenges outside the First Amendment context, as a plurality of the Supreme Court recently has noted." (citing Morales, 527 U.S. at 55 n. 22, 119 S.Ct. 1849 ) (emphasis in original)), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2520 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rybicki
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lerman v. Bd. of Elections of New York, 232 F.3d 135 , 144 n. 10 (2d Cir.2000) (“It is not even clear that Salerno’s ‘no set of circumstances’ test articulates an exclusive standard for making facial challenges outside the First Amendment context, as a plurality of the Supreme Court recently has noted.” (citing Morales, 527 U.S. at 55 n. 22, 119 S.Ct. 1849 ) (emphasis in original)), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2520 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Wright
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: accord · confidence high
Examining such materials is consistent with the principle that a court may not dismiss a pro se complaint unless it is “beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 521 , 92 S.Ct. 594 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per cu-riam) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)); accord Lerman v. Bd. of Elections, 232 F.3d 135 , 140 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2520 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Appeal of the Office of the Consumer Advocate
N.H. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Appeal of Campaign for Ratepayers Rights, 145 N.H. 671, 674-75 , cert. denied, 533 U.S. 916 (2001); RSA 541:13 (1997).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. David Allen Miller
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lerman v. Bd. of Elections, 232 F.3d 135 , 142 n. 6 (2d Cir,2000), cert. denied, - U.S. 121 S.Ct. 2520 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kahn
v.
Dean & Fulkerson, P. C.
No. 00-1583.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 2001.
533 U.S. 916
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.