discussed Cited "see" Donati v. State See United States v. Siddiqui, 235 F.3d 1318, 1323 (11th Cir.2000) (e-mail by defendant not hearsay because not offered to prove the truth of the substantive content and because it was an admission of a party opponent), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 940 , 121 S.Ct. 2573 , 150 L.Ed.2d 737 (2001). 8 .

cited Cited "see" Fenje v. Feld See United States v. Siddiqui, 235 F.3d 1318, 1322-23 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 940 , 121 S.Ct. 2573 , 150 L.Ed.2d 737 (2001); B.S. ex rel.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Eleck See, e.g., State v. John L., supra, 85 Conn. App. 298 -302; see also United States v. Siddiqui, 235 F.3d 1318, 1322-23 (11th Cir. 2000) (e-mails authenticated not only by defendant’s e-mail address but also by inclusion of factual details known to defendant that were corroborated by telephone conversations), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 940 , 121 S. Ct. 2573 , 150 L.