green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See generally United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 671-72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 219 , 151 L.Ed.2d 156 (2001); see, e.g., United States v. Concepcion, 983 F.2d 369, 381-82 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 856 , 114 S.Ct. 163 , 126 L.Ed.2d 124 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luke Jones
See generally United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 671-72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 219 , 151 L.Ed.2d 156 (2001); see, e.g., United States v. Concepcion, 983 F.2d 369, 381-82 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 856 , 114 S.Ct. 163 , 126 L.Ed.2d 124 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hyman
Id. at 323 . "[A]ny error was one of form rather than substance. [The agent] was clearly qualified; that her credentials were established after she began her substantive testimony, rather than at its outset, did not affect [the defendant's] substantial rights." Ibid. ; see also United States v. Mendoza , 244 F. 3d 1037 , 1046 (9th Cir.) (finding harmless the admission of lay opinion, instead of expert opinion, where the court "discern[s] from the record that the witness could have been qualified as an expert"), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 221 , 151 L.Ed. 2d 158 (2001) ; *459 United…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ELEX HYMAN(10-11-2077, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
Id. at 323 . "[A]ny error was one of form rather than substance. [The agent] was clearly qualified; that her credentials were established after she began her substantive testimony, rather than at its outset, did not affect [the defendant's] substantial rights." Ibid.; see also United States v. Mendoza, 244 F.3d 1037, 1046 (9th Cir.) (finding harmless the admission of lay opinion, instead of expert opinion, where the court "discern[s] from the record that the witness could have been qualified as an expert"), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S. Ct. 221 , 151 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sanseverino
(2×)
Ed. 2d 807 (1981); State v. Rodriguez, supra, 180 Conn. 405 ; see also United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 676 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S. Ct. 219 , 151 L.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ray
(3×)
Ed. 2d 807 (1981); State v. Rodriguez, supra, 180 Conn. 405 ; see also United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 676 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S. Ct. 219 , 151 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sanseverino
Compare United States v. Hunt, 129 F.3d 739, 745-46 (5th Cir. 1997) (instruction not required but should be considered in determining whether modification of judgment unduly prejudicial to defendant), United States v. Smith, 13 F.3d 380, 383 (10th Cir. 1993) (no undue prejudice due to modification of judgment because possibility of instruction on lesser included offense existed throughout trial, and all elements were proven beyond reasonable doubt), and Shields v. State, 722 So. 2d 584, 587 (Miss. 1998) (“lesser included offense need not be before the jury in order to apply the direct remand…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Douglas
Thus, there was and is “no general federal statute proscribing attempt,” and we have consistently held that an attempt to commit criminal conduct “is therefore actionable only tuhere ... a specific criminal statute makes impermissible its attempted as well as actual violation,” Manley, 632 F.2d at 987 (emphasis added); see, e.g., United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 675 (2d Cir.2001) (“ ‘[ujnder Fed.R.Crim.P. 31(c), a defendant may be found guilty of an attempt to commit a substantive offense, whether or not the attempt was charged in the indictment, provided an attempt is punish…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dowdell
See, e.g., United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 667 (2d Cir.2001) (“[T] he district court or the prosecutor may make ‘ministerial change[s]’ to the indictment, such as to correct a misnomer or typographical errors.”) cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 219 , 151 L.Ed.2d 156 (2001); United States v. Robles-Vertiz, 155 F.3d 725 (5th Cir.1998)(no constructive amendment where the indictment misnamed a key party and the government was permitted to correct the error); United States v. Johnson, 741 F.2d 1338, 1341 (11th Cir.1984)(finding that “amendments that are merely a matter of for…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Henderson
See, e.g., United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 651 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 534 U.S. 897 (2001); United States v. Cherry, 217 F.3d at 814-15 ; United States v. Emery, 186 F.3d 921, 926 (8th Cir. 1999), cert. denied 528 U.S. 1130 (2000); Meeks, 277 Kan. at 614 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Edwards
See, e.g., United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 650-651 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 (2001); United States v. White, 116 F.3d 903, 911 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sharon Jackson Anthony Mazyck, Also Known as Tony
Under Rule 901 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, “[t]he requirement of authentication ... as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.” Fed.R.Evid. 901(a); see also United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 658 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 219 , 151 L.Ed.2d 156 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Cotto v. Victor Herbert, Warden, Attica Correctional Facility
See, e.g., U.S. v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 651 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 219 , 151 L.Ed.2d 156 (2001) (collecting cases).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mendez-Argueta
See, e.g., United States v. Mendoza, 244 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 221 , 151 L.Ed.2d 158 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hyland
v.
Stevens, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States
v.
Stevens, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States
No. 01-326.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.