green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene H. Leathers
See United States v. Kriens, 270 F.3d 597, 602 (8th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1008 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Leathers
(2×)
See United States v. Kriens, 270 F.3d 597, 602 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 1586 , 152 L.Ed.2d 504 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
(2×)
See Arnold v. Runnels, 421 F.3d 859, 862 (9th Cir.2005)(defendant "unequivocally invoked his right not to speak on tape by saying he did not want to talk on tape"); United States v. Reid, 211 F.Supp.2d 366, 372 (D.Mass.2002)("Reid's statement that `I have nothing else to say' was a sufficiently pellucid invocation of his right to remain silent"); United States v. Stewart, 51 F.Supp.2d 1136, 1142-45 (D.Kan.1999)(defendant invoked his right to remain silent when he "indicated that he `did not want to talk about a robbery'" and stated "I don't want to talk to you m_____ f_____"), reconsidered in …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Munoz-Elias
United States v. Garcia-Cruz, 978 F.2d 537, 542 (9th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Bushyhead, 270 F.3d 905, 912-13 (9th Cir.2001) (“I have nothing to say, I’m going to get the death penalty anyway” was an invocation of right to remain silent), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1586 , 152 L.Ed.2d 504 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scott
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-8974.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 2002.
Published
SCOTT
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-8974.
Supreme Court of the United States.
April 15, 2002.
1
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.