discussed Cited "see" Slaughter v. Mullin See Engberg v. Wyoming, 265 F.3d 1109, 1114, 1115-16 (10th Cir.2001) (holding habeas petitioner had exhausted his claim that prosecutor presented false argument regarding witness’s composure during robbery, when petitioner had presented “essential substance” of this issue in state court claim challenging State’s failure to reveal its attempt to hypnotize State witness), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1001 , 122 S.Ct. 1570 , 152 L.Ed.2d 490 (2002).