green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
1.9 score
“the most adequate plaintiff ... is the person or group of persons that ... in the determination of the court, has the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class.”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Albert Fadem Trust v. CITIGROUP INC.
the most adequate plaintiff ... is the person or group of persons that ... in the determination of the court, has the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tanne v. Autobytel, Inc.
Feb.6, 1997); see also In re Cendant Corp. Litigation, 264 F.3d 201, 263 (3d Cir.2001) (stating that “[t]he initial inquiry (i.e., the determination of whether the movant with the largest interest in the case ‘otherwise satisfies’ Rule 23) should be confined to determining whether the movant has made a prima facie showing of typicality and adequacy”), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 929 , 122 S.Ct. 1300 , 152 L.Ed.2d 212 (2002); Gluck v. CellStar Corp., 976 F.Supp. 542, 546 (N.D.Tex.1997) (“Evidence regarding the requirements of Rule 23 will, of course, be heard in full at the class certifica…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mark
v.
California Public Employees' Retirement System
v.
California Public Employees' Retirement System
01-997.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 2002.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
MARK
v.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ET AL.
No. 01-997.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 18, 2002.
1
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 264 F. 3d 201.