California Dep't of Youth Auth. v. Douglas, 536 U.S. 924 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
California Dep't of Youth Auth. v. Douglas, 536 U.S. 924 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “to the extent a drug quantity affects a defendant’s statutory maximum sentence, it is an aspect of the crime that ... must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt”
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Brisco (ca7, 2003-12-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Brisco
7th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
to the extent a drug quantity affects a defendant's statutory maximum sentence, it is an aspect of the crime that ... must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt
discussed Cited "see" M.A., on Behalf of E.S., M.A., A.T. On Behalf of G.T., A.T., G.L. On Behalf A.O., G.L., H.M. On Behalf M.M., H.M., O.J. On Behalf of O.D.J., O.J., A.E. On Behalf of A.J.E. And A.E., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. State-Operated School District of the City of Newark New Jersey Department of Education Vito A. Gagliardi, Sr., in His Individual Capacity William L. Librera, Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Education, in His Official Capacity Barbara Gantwerk, Director, Office of Special Education Programs, New Jersey Department of Education, in Her Official and Individual Capacities Melinda Zangrillo, Coordinator of Compliance, Office of Special Education Programs, New Jersey Department of Education, in Her Official and Individual Capacities, United States of America (Intervenor in d.c.) (2×)
3rd Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Douglas v. California Dept. of Youth Authority, 271 F.3d 812, 820 (9th Cir.) ("If we conclude that California waived its sovereign immunity by accepting Federal Rehabilitation Act funds, we need not reach the question whether Congress validly abrogated the states' sovereign immunity under the Rehabilitation Act."), amended by 271 F.3d 910 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 924 , 122 S.Ct. 2591 , 153 L.Ed.2d 780 (2002); see also Koslow, 302 F.3d at 169 (reserving consideration of abrogation of sovereign immunity under the Rehabilitation Act, while finding that Pennsylvania had waived its Eleven…
discussed Cited "see" M.A. Ex Rel. E.S. v. State-Operated School District of Newark (2×)
3rd Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Douglas v. California Dept. of Youth Authority, 271 F.3d 812, 820 (9th Cir.) (“If we conclude that California waived its sovereign immunity by accepting Federal Rehabilitation Act funds, we need not reach the question whether Congress validly abrogated the states’ sovereign immunity under the Rehabilitation Act.”), amended by 271 F.3d 910 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 924 , 122 S.Ct. 2591 , 153 L.Ed.2d 780 (2002); see also Koslow, 302 F.3d at 169 (reserving consideration of abrogation of sovereign immunity under the Rehabilitation Act, while finding that Pennsylvania had waived its …
cited Cited "see" James v. Herbert
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wallace, 276 F.3d 360, 368 (7th Cir.) (noting Seventh Circuit’s rejection of Cancilla’s per se rule), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 924 , 122 S.Ct. 2592 , 153 L.Ed.2d 781 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California Department of Youth Authority
v.
Douglas
01-1546.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 2002.
536 U.S. 924
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

536 U.S. 924

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH AUTHORITY
v.
DOUGLAS.

No. 01-1546.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 17, 2002.

1

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 271 F. 3d 812 and 910.