green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Charles Towery v. Charles Ryan
See State v. Sansing, 26 P.3d 1118, 1129 (Ariz. 2001) (citing Towery for the proposition that the “sentencer there- fore must consider the defendant’s upbringing if proffered but is not required to give it significant mitigating weight.” (emphasis added) (quoting Towery, 290 P.2d at 311) (internal quotation marks omitted)), judgment vacated on other grounds by Sansing v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 954 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Charles Towery v Charles Ryan
See State v. Sansing, 200 Ariz. 347 , 26 P.3d 1118, 1129 (2001) (citing Towery for the proposition that the “sentencer therefore must consider the defendant’s upbringing if proffered but is not required to give it significant mitigating weight.” (emphasis added) (quoting Towery, 920 P.2d at 311 ) (internal quotation marks omitted)), judgment vacated on other grounds by Sansing v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 954 , 122 S.Ct. 2654 , 153 L.Ed.2d 830 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali Manuel
See State v. Sansing, 200 Ariz. 347 , 353 ¶ 12, 26 P.3d 1118, 1124 (2001), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 536 U.S. 954 , 122 S.Ct. 2654 , 153 L.Ed.2d 830 (2002). ¶44 Sufficient evidence exists to support the jury’s finding.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Modden
(2×)
NOTES [1] Modden v. State, 721 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). [2] Ex parte Modden, No. 71,312 (Tex.Crim.App. delivered Feb. 12, 1992) (not designated for publication); see Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 328 , 109 S.Ct. 2934 , 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989) (holding that jurors that are considering the death penalty must have a vehicle to give effect to their reasoned moral response to the defendant's mitigating evidence). [3] Modden v. State , No, 71,493 (Tex.Crim.App. delivered June 8, 1994) (not designated for publication). [4] Ex parte Modden, No. 11,364-04 (Tex.Crim.App. delivered July 1, 1998) …
discussed
Cited "see"
Lynn v. Reinstein
But while Payne overruled Booth’s per se ban on victims’ statements regarding the victim and the impact of the crime on the victim’s family, it did not find victims’ sentencing opinions relevant. 5 Id. at 827 , 830 & n. 2, 111 S.Ct. at 2609 , 2611 & n. 2; accord State v. Sansing, 200 Ariz. 347, 358, ¶¶ 35-37 , 26 P.3d 1118, 1129 (2001) (affirming the trial court’s refusal *191 to consider the victim’s ten-year-old daughter’s request for mercy as a mitigating circumstance because the request for mercy was not relevant to mitigation), vacated on other grounds by 536 U.S. 954 , 12…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bell
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
01-8716.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2002.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Atkins v. Virginia, ante, p. 304.