Bell v. Cockrell, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Institutional Div., 536 U.S. 954 (2002). · Go Syfert
Bell v. Cockrell, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Institutional Div., 536 U.S. 954 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sansing (ariz, 2003-09-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Sansing
Ariz. · 2003 · confidence medium
Ring II, 536 U.S. at 609, 122 S.Ct. at 2443.
discussed Cited "see" Robert Charles Towery v. Charles Ryan
9th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sansing, 26 P.3d 1118, 1129 (Ariz. 2001) (citing Towery for the proposition that the “sentencer there- fore must consider the defendant’s upbringing if proffered but is not required to give it significant mitigating weight.” (emphasis added) (quoting Towery, 290 P.2d at 311) (internal quotation marks omitted)), judgment vacated on other grounds by Sansing v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 954 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Robert Charles Towery v Charles Ryan
9th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sansing, 200 Ariz. 347 , 26 P.3d 1118, 1129 (2001) (citing Towery for the proposition that the “sentencer therefore must consider the defendant’s upbringing if proffered but is not required to give it significant mitigating weight.” (emphasis added) (quoting Towery, 920 P.2d at 311 ) (internal quotation marks omitted)), judgment vacated on other grounds by Sansing v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 954 , 122 S.Ct. 2654 , 153 L.Ed.2d 830 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali Manuel
Ariz. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sansing, 200 Ariz. 347 , 353 ¶ 12, 26 P.3d 1118, 1124 (2001), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 536 U.S. 954 , 122 S.Ct. 2654 , 153 L.Ed.2d 830 (2002). ¶44 Sufficient evidence exists to support the jury’s finding.
discussed Cited "see" Ex Parte Modden (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
NOTES [1] Modden v. State, 721 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). [2] Ex parte Modden, No. 71,312 (Tex.Crim.App. delivered Feb. 12, 1992) (not designated for publication); see Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 328 , 109 S.Ct. 2934 , 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989) (holding that jurors that are considering the death penalty must have a vehicle to give effect to their reasoned moral response to the defendant's mitigating evidence). [3] Modden v. State , No, 71,493 (Tex.Crim.App. delivered June 8, 1994) (not designated for publication). [4] Ex parte Modden, No. 11,364-04 (Tex.Crim.App. delivered July 1, 1998) …
discussed Cited "see" Lynn v. Reinstein
Ariz. · 2003 · signal: accord · confidence high
But while Payne overruled Booth’s per se ban on victims’ statements regarding the victim and the impact of the crime on the victim’s family, it did not find victims’ sentencing opinions relevant. 5 Id. at 827 , 830 & n. 2, 111 S.Ct. at 2609 , 2611 & n. 2; accord State v. Sansing, 200 Ariz. 347, 358, ¶¶ 35-37 , 26 P.3d 1118, 1129 (2001) (affirming the trial court’s refusal *191 to consider the victim’s ten-year-old daughter’s request for mercy as a mitigating circumstance because the request for mercy was not relevant to mitigation), vacated on other grounds by 536 U.S. 954 , 12…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bell
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Atkins v. Virginia, ante, p. 304.