Villacreses v. United States, 537 U.S. 1022 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Villacreses v. United States, 537 U.S. 1022 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a conspiracy may be inferred from circumstantial evidence which may reasonably be interpreted as participation in a common plan.”
46 citation events (46 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Charles Oliver (ca6, 2019-03-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Charles Oliver
6th Cir. · 2019 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a conspiracy may be inferred from circumstantial evidence which may reasonably be interpreted as participation in a common plan.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ignacio Montes-Medina
8th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 287 F.3d 739, 742-43 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 (2002).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Montes-Medina
8th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 287 F.3d 739, 742-43 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 , 123 S.Ct. 531 , 154 L.Ed.2d 432 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Donald K. Washburn
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Walls, 293 F.3d 959, 970 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 983 , 123 S.Ct. 454 , 154 L.Ed.2d 346 (2002), 537 U.S. 1022 , 123 S.Ct. 543 , 154 L.Ed.2d 431 (2002); cf. United States v. Rodriguez, 414 F.3d 837 , 841-42 n. 2 (8th Cir.2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael Gamboa
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 287 F.3d 739, 743 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 (2002).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael Gerald Gamboa
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 287 F.3d 739, 743 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 , 123 S.Ct. 531 , 154 L.Ed.2d 432 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Eileen Crowell
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 761 (9th Cir.2002) (holding petitioner may not resort to coram nobis as a means of bypassing habeas relief under AEDPA, even if the petitioner fails to meet AEDPA’s requirements), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 , 123 S.Ct. 544 , 154 L.Ed.2d 431 (2002); Owens v. Boyd, 235 F.3d 356, 360 (7th Cir.2000) (precluding coram nobis as a means available to avoid statutory restrictions on federal habeas relief); United States v. Baptiste, 223 F.3d 188, 189-90 (3d Cir.2000) (per curiam) (holding that coram nobis was unavailable to prisoner who remained in cust…
cited Cited "see" Guevarra v. Ashcroft
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 760 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 , 123 S.Ct. 544 , 154 L.Ed.2d 431 (2002).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Anthony Dejohn (02-3158) Christopher Harb (02-3175) (4×)
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Walls, 293 F.3d 959, 970 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 , 123 S.Ct. 543 , 154 L.Ed.2d 431 (2002); United States v. Suarez, 263 F.3d 468, 479-80 (6th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 , 122 S.Ct. 1547 , 152 L.Ed.2d 472 (2002); United States v. Andrews, 633 F.2d 449, 456 (6th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 927 , 101 S.Ct. 1382 , 67 L.Ed.2d 358 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harb
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Walls, 293 unpersuasive, as Lawrence’s holding is in no way factbound, F.3d 959, 969 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 (2002). and is foursquare on the law: Apprendi does not apply to The district court in no way indicated that it did not have the Guidelines determinations, only statutory maximums, and authority to grant a downward departure, and in fact granted Apprendi does not govern increases in statutory minimum a downward departure for perceived double-counting on sentences.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Martinez-Pelaez
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Matus-Leva, 311 F.3d 1214, 1217 (9th Cir.) (noting that Apprendi is not implicated in a case that does not involve sentencing factors to be decided by a judge that increase the penalty beyond the statutory maximum), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 , 123 S.Ct. 544 , 154 L.Ed.2d 431 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Baker v. State of Alaska
D. Alaska · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Docket 4 at 1–2. 12 Matus–Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 761 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1022 (2002). 13 Rule 4(b), Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the United States District Courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Villacreses
v.
United States
02-6769.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 2002.
537 U.S. 1022
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)

537 U.S. 1022

VILLACRESES
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-6769.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 12, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 49 Fed. Appx. 287.