green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Finnicum v. Wyeth, Inc.
“Unsubstantiated assertions, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” Brown , 337 F.3d *619 at 541; accord Hugh Symons Group, plc v. Motorola, Inc., 292 F.3d 466, 468 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 386 , 154 L.Ed.2d 295 (2002); see Hockman v. Westward Commc’ns, LLC, 407 F.3d 317, 332 (5th Cir.2004); Bridgmon v. Array Sys.
discussed
Cited "see"
Simco Enterprises, Ltd. v. James River Insurance
“Unsubstantiated assertions, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” Brown, 337 F.3d at 541 ; accord Hugh Symons Group, plc v. Motorola, Inc., 292 F.3d 466, 468 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 386 , 154 L.Ed.2d 295 (2002); see Hockman v. Westward Commc’ns, LLC, 407 F.3d 317 , 332 *560 (5th Cir.2004); Bridgmon v. Array Sys.
discussed
Cited "see"
Verret v. United States
“Unsubstantiated assertions, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” Brown, 337 F.3d at 541 ; accord Hugh Symons Group, pic v. Motorola, Inc., 292 F.3d 466, 468 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 386 , 154 L.Ed.2d 295 (2002); see Hockman v. Westward Commc’ns, LLC, 407 F.3d 317, 332 (5th Cir.2004); Bridgmon v. Array Sys.
discussed
Cited "see"
Craig v. PONDEROSA DEVELOPMENT, LP
“Unsubstantiated assertions, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” Brown, 337 F.3d at 541 ; accord Hugh Symons Group, plc v. Motorola, Inc., 292 F.3d 466, 468 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 386 , 154 L.Ed.2d 295 (2002); see Hockman v. Westward Commc’ns, LLC, 407 F.3d 317, 332 (5th Cir.2004); Bridgmon v. Array Sys.
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Texas Department of Transportation
“Unsubstantiated assertions, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” Brown, 337 F.3d at 541 ; accord Hugh Symons Group, plc v. Motorola, Inc., 292 F.3d 466, 468 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 386 , 154 L.Ed.2d 295 (2002); see Hockman v. Westward Commc’ns, LLC, 407 F.3d 317, 332 (5th Cir.2004); Bridgmon v. Array Sys.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. RGIS Inventory Specialists
“Unsubstantiated assertions, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” Brown, 337 F.3d at 541; accord Hugh Symons Group, plc v. Motorola, Inc., 292 F.3d 466, 468 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 386 , 154 L.Ed.2d 295 (2002); see Hockman v. Westward Commc’ns, LLC, 407 F.3d 317, 332 (5th Cir.2004); Bridgmon v. Array Sys.
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Disher, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citigroup Global Markets Incorporated
See Riley v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1340 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 395 , 154 L.Ed.2d 296 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Disher, Richard v. Citigroup Global
See Riley v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1340 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carbajal-Martinez
See United States v. Harris, 293 F.3d 863, 871 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 395 , 154 L.Ed.2d 296 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Cole, 293 F.3d 153, 163 (4th Cir.) (giving standard of review), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 387 , 154 L.Ed.2d 296 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franklin v. Apple Inc.
CODE § 17.50(a); see also Hugh Symons Group, plc v. Motorola, Inc., 292 F.3d 466, 468 (5th Cir. 2002) (citing Chamrad v. Volvo Cars of North America, 145 F.3d 671 , 672 n. 3 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 (2002)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South Dallas Water Authority v. Guarantee Co. of North America, USA
(Doc. 1, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, at ¶¶3 & 5) The issue would appear to be a lost cause for The Guarantee Company and doom this case to remand since it is clear that a district court “cannot exercise diversity jurisdiction if one of the plaintiffs shares the same citizenship as any one of the defendants!,]” Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LP, 355 F.3d 853, 857 (5th Cir.2003) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2421 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004); see also Riley v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th Cir.) (“In order for federal diversity ju…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph v. Government of the Virgin Islands
See, e.g., United States v. Harris, 293 F.3d 863, 870 (5th Cir. 2002) (finding that the trial judge did not err in instructing the jury that the defendant had used a baton because that fact was undisputed, and noting that the jury itself had to determine whether the baton constituted a dangerous weapon), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S. Ct. 395 , 154 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riley, as Trustee Of, and Participant In, the Performance Toyota, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
02-378.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2002.
537 U.S. 950
Published
RILEY, AS TRUSTEE OF, AND PARTICIPANT IN, THE PERFORMANCE TOYOTA, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ET AL.
v.
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. ET AL.
No. 02-378.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 15, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 292 F. 3d 1334.