Murks v. United States, 538 U.S. 1048 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Murks v. United States, 538 U.S. 1048 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. James Charles Poe (ca8, 2005-11-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. James Charles Poe (2×)
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 590 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1048 (2003). -7- representation over timely objection reversal is automatic." Id. at 488 (citing Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 , 75–76 (1942)).
cited Cited "see" United States v. James Charles Poe, III
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 590 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1048 , 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Twilegar v. State
Fla. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Nelson v. State, 748 So.2d 237 (Fla.1999); see also United States v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 590-91 (8th Cir.2002) (holding that the Confrontation Clause did not guarantee the defendant the right to cross-examine a speaker whose statements were imputed to the defendant as adoptive admissions of a party opponent), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1048 , 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Clark (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
To indicate adoption, it must appear that the party heard the statement, the matter was within his or her knowledge, and, "perhaps most importantly," "the occasion and nature of the statement [were] such that the party would likely have replied if he did not mean to accept what was said." Id. (omitted); see also U.S. v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 591 (8th Cir.2002), cert. den., 538 U.S. 1048 , 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003) (for an out-of-court statement to constitute an adopted admission under FRE 801(d)(2)(B), the defendant must have been present when the statement was made, have underst…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Globe v. State
Fla. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Nelson v. State, 748 So.2d 237 (Fla.1999); see also United States v. Kehoe, 310 F.3d 579, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2002) (holding that the Confrontation Clause did not guarantee the defendant the right to cross-examine a speaker whose statements *673 were imputed to the defendant as adoptive admissions of a party opponent), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1048 , 123 S.Ct. 2112 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murks
v.
United States
02-10112.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 2003.
538 U.S. 1048
Published

538 U.S. 1048

MURKS
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-10112.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 19, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 52 Fed. Appx. 821.