green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ALEMAN v. DAVIS
if counsel requests a lesser-included charge, the trial court must give that charge if there is a rational basis in the record to do so.
cited
Cited "see"
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LARRY DUKES (17-06-0718, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
See State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 180 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DESHAUN J. WILLIAMS (14-09-2178, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
See State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 168-69 (2003), cert. denied, N.J. v. Garron, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S. Ct. 1169 , 157 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Osborne S. Maloney (068877)
(2×)
See State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 180 (2003) (“No defendant should be convicted of a greater crime or acquitted merely because the jury was precluded from considering a lesser offense that is clearly indicated in the record.”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S. Ct. 1169 , 157 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Byrd
See State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 168-69 , 827 A. 2d 243 (2003) (explaining that "[t]he Federal and New Jersey Constitutions guarantee criminal defendants a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense," including "rights to confront, cross-examine, and produce witnesses" and "to elicit testimony favorable to the defense before the trier of fact" (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S.Ct. 1169 , 157 L.Ed. 2d 1204 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Byrd
See State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 168-69 , 827 A.2d 243 (2003) (explaining that “[t]he Federal and New Jersey Constitutions guarantee criminal defendants a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense,” including “rights to confront, cross-examine, and produce witnesses” and “to elicit testimony favorable to the defense before the trier of fact” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S.Ct. 1169 , 157 L.Ed. 2d 1204 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Samuels
(2×)
See State v. Jenkins, 178 N.J. 347, 361 , 840 A. 2d 242 (2004) (stating that trial court has independent obligation to instruct on lesser-included charges when facts indicate that jury could convict on lesser charge) (quoting State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 180 , 827 A. 2d 243 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S.Ct. 1169 , 157 L.Ed. 2d 1204 (2004)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Denofa
See State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 180 , 827 A.2d 243 (2003) (citing State v. Powell, 84 N.J. 305, 319 , 419 A.2d 406 (1980)), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S.Ct. 1169 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1204 (2004); State v. Choice, 98 N.J. 295, 298-99 , 486 A.2d 833 (1985) (citing Powell, supra, 84 N.J. at 318 , 419 A.2d 406 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Ingle v. Circuit City
See Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Ingle, 540 U.S. 1160 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City, a Virginia Corporation
See Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Ingle, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S.Ct. 1169 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1204 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Adler v. Fred Lind Manor
See Br. of Pet'r at 30-31 (citing Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 328 F.3d 1165, 1171 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S.Ct. 1169 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1204 (2004)).
cited
Cited "see"
Adler v. Fred Lind Manor
See Br. of Pet’r at 30-31 (citing Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 328 F.3d 1165, 1171 (9th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 (2004)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARJORIE ANNA STUBBLEFIELD(13-01-0044, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
Super. 367, 378-79 (App. Div. 2008) (stating that it was appropriate for the trial court to allow defendant latitude in presenting a defense); see also State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 169 (2003) (stating that "when the mechanistic application of a state's rules of evidence or procedure would undermine the truth-finding function by excluding relevant evidence necessary to a defendant's ability to defend against the charged offenses, the Confrontation and Compulsory Process Clauses must prevail"), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S. Ct. 1169 , 157 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Blazas
We next turn to defendant’s argument that his right to present a complete defense was violated by the State’s alleged interference with his ability to interview prosecution witnesses. “[T]he Constitution guarantees criminal defendants ‘a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.’ ” (Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 688, 690 , 106 S.Ct. 2142, 2146 , 90 L.Ed.2d 636, 645 (1986)); see also State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 168 , 827 A.2d 243 (2003) (“The Federal and New Jersey Constitutions guarantee criminal defendants ‘a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.�…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Villanueva
See, e.g., State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 179-181 , 827 A.2d 243 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160 , 124 S.Ct. 1169 , 157 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Lara
v.
Lara
No. 03-107.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 26, 2004.
540 U.S. 1160
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 539 U. S. 987.] Motion of respondent to strike portions of the amici curiae brief on behalf of Eighteen American Indian Tribes, Lac Courte Oreilles Tribe, et al. denied.