Kwok v. New York City Transit Auth., 540 U.S. 811 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Kwok v. New York City Transit Auth., 540 U.S. 811 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
130 citation events (130 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Allah v. Semple (ctd, 2019-12-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Allah v. Semple
D. Conn. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Crowder v. Farinella
D. Conn. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Kyles v. Pillia
D. Conn. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 (2003).1 III.
discussed Cited "see" Daniels v. Diamond Resorts Financial Services, Inc.
S.D.W. Va · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ting v. AT&T, 319 F.3d 1126 , 1149 (9th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 (2003) (“Where an arbitration agreement is concerned, the agreement is unconscionable unless the arbitration remedy contains a ‘modicum of bilaterality.’”) (quoting Armendariz v. Found.
cited Cited "see" Fathers & Families, Inc. v. Mulligan
Mass. Super. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hodges v. Thompson, 311 F.3d 316 , 318 (4th Cir.2002), cert. den., 540 U.S. 811 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Security Service Federal Credit Union v. Sanders
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ting v. AT & T, 182 F.Supp.2d 902, 933 (N.D.Ca.2002) (holding that, “[w]hereas this clause may be illegal as applied to plaintiffs’ statutory rights under the CLRA, it is not substantively unconscionable when applied to non-statutory claims.”), ajfd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 319 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003); see also Hoover, 206 S.W.3d at 563 (provision in attorney-client contract held substantively unconscionable on public policy grounds); Crowell, 495 S.W.2d at 889 (contract exempting housing authori…
cited Cited "see" Motorcycle Excellence Group, Inc. v. BMW of North America, LLC (In Re Motorcycle Excellence Group, Inc.)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Myrna Ochoa-Carrillo v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: accord · confidence high
The Supreme Court long ago characterized this due process argument as “without substance.” Marcello v. Bonds, 349 U.S. 302, 311 , 75 S.Ct. 757 , 99 L.Ed. 1107 (1955); accord Gomez-Chavez v. Perryman, 308 F.3d 796, 802 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003); United States v. Garcia-Martinez, 228 F.3d 956, 960-61 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1179 , 121 S.Ct. 1158 , 148 L.Ed.2d 1018 (2001); United States v. Benitez-Villafuerte, 186 F.3d 651, 659-60 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1097 , 120 S.Ct. 838 , 145 L.Ed.2d 704 (2000). 6.Final…
discussed Cited "see" Myrna Ochoa-Carrillo v. John Ashcroft
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: accord · confidence high
The Supreme Court long ago characterized this due process argument as “without substance.” Marcello v. Bonds, 349 U.S. 302, 311 (1955); accord Gomez-Chavez v. Perryman, 308 F.3d 796, 802 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 (2003); United States v. Garcia-Martinez, 228 F.3d 956, 960-61 (9th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1179 (2001); United States v. Benitez-Villafuerte, 186 F.3d 651, 659-60 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1097 (2000). 6.
cited Cited "see" Chao v. Duncan (In Re Duncan)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Rossi (In Re Cambridge Capital, LLC)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Unin, 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Oligbo v. Louis (In Re Oligbo)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Ochs v. Nemes (In Re Nemes)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Kasper v. City of Middletown
D. Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 42 (2d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 , 2003 WL 1988534 (Oct. 6, 2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sadowski v. Admerasia Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir. 2000) (on motion for summary judgment, “[t]he time has come . . . ‘to put up or shut up.’”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Machado v. System4 LLC
Mass. · 2015 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Ting v. AT&T, 319 F.3d 1126 , 1151-1152 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 (2003) (confidentiality provision held substantively unconscionable when applied to large class of customers), with Kilgore v. KeyBank, Nat’l Ass’n, 718 F.3d 1052 , 1059 n.9 (9th Cir. 2013) (“small number of putative class members . . . mitigates” confidentiality provision concerns).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. North Bellmore School District
E.D.N.Y · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
June 26, 2009) ("[A]ll three terms are age-neutral and do not by themselves suggest age bias.”) (collecting cases); see also Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (holding that descriptions of the plaintiff as "nice” and "nurturing” “provide[ ] no evidence of pretext or discriminatory intent” based on sex, because these are "simply not qualities that are stereotypically female”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." M.O.C.H.A. Society, Inc. v. City of Buffalo
W.D.N.Y. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Because the analysis of claims brought under the NYSHRL parallels the analysis of Title VII claims, the court considers these claims “in tandem.” Leopold v. Baccarat, Inc., 174 F.3d 261 , 264 n. 1 (2d Cir.1999); see also Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33 , 42 n. 1 (2d Cir.2000) (citing cases), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Timmins Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Narricot Industries, L.P.
E.D. Va. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Miller Waste Mills, Inc., 334 N.L.R.B. 466 , 469 (2001), enforced, 315 F.3d 951 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 51 , 157 L.Ed.2d 23 (2003) ("In analyzing the adequacy of an employer's defense to a withdrawal of recognition allegation, the Board will only examine factors actually ‘relied on’ by the employer....
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Whitlow v. VISITING NURSE ASS'N OF WESTERN NY
W.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
R.Civ.P. 56(e); Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548 ; see also Weinstock v. Columbia University, 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000) (at summary judgment, “[t]he time has come ... ‘to put up or shut up.’ ”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kwok
v.
New York City Transit Authority
02-1504.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 811
Published

540 U.S. 811

KWOK
v.
NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY ET AL.

No. 02-1504.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 6, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 2d Cir.

2

Certiorari denied.