green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Soto-Ramirez v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Soto-Beníquez, 356 F.3d 1, 55 (1st Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1074 , 124 S.Ct. 2432 , 158 L.Ed.2d 985 (2004). 1 On June 16, 2005, Soto-Ramirez filed the instant petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thompson
(2×)
See United States v. Soto-Beniquez, 356 F.3d 1, 19 (1st Cir.2003) (“The government need not show that each conspirator knew of or had contact with all other members.”), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1074 , 124 S.Ct. 2412 , 2427, 158 L.Ed.2d 985 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Perez-Ruiz
(2×)
See United States v. Soto-Beniquez, 356 F.3d 1, 48-50 (1st Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1074 , 124 S.Ct. 2412 , 158 L.Ed.2d 985 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Day v. Sebelius
See Petit v. City of Chicago, 352 F.3d 1111, 1113 (7th Cir.2003) (officers who would have been rejected for promotion even without allegedly discriminatory process lacked standing to bring equal protection claim against that process because they failed to suffer cognizable injury), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1074 , 124 S.Ct. 2426 , 158 L.Ed.2d 984 (2004); see also Rector v. City and County of Denver, 348 F.3d 935, 945 (10th Cir.2003) (named representatives of class of parking ticket recipients lacked standing to pursue claim that tickets deprived class of due process by giving erroneous impression…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Payne
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Soto-Beniquez, 356 F.3d 1, 36 (1st Cir. 2003) (when “a defendant abandons property while he is being pursued by police officers, he forfeits any reasonable expectation of privacy he may have had in that property”), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1074 , 124 S. Ct. 2432 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gomez-Rosario
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Soto-Beníquez, 356 F.3d 1, 19 (1st Cir. 2004) (“The government need not show that each conspirator knew of or had contact with all other members.”), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1074 , 124 S.Ct. 2432 , 158 L.Ed.2d 985 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fernandez-Malave
v.
United States
v.
United States
03-10001.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 2004.
Published
FERNANDEZ-MALAVE
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 03-10001.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 1, 2004.
1
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 356 F. 3d 1.