green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. McCann, 366 F.3d 46, 56-57 (1st Cir.2004), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1104 , 125 S.Ct. 986 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1017 (2005), (stating that the issue of a prosecutor’s use of a defendant’s pre-arrest, pre-Miranda silence has not been definitely resolved by this court); compare United States v. Burson, 952 F.2d 1196 , 1201 *63 (10th Cir.1991) (finding plain error where court allowed admission of IRS agent's testimony regarding the defendant’s silence during a non-custodial interrogation), with United States v. Rivera, 944 F.2d 1563, 1568 (11th Cir.l991)("…
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. United States
See United States v. Smith, 107 Fed.Appx. 185 (11th Cir.2004), cert. granted, judgment vacated by Smith v. United States, 543 U.S. 1104 , 125 S.Ct. 1032 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1018 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Begaye
(2×)
See United States v. Phipps, 368 F.3d 505, 515 (5th Cir.2004) (affirming a § 5K2.3 departure based on "the unrebutted statements by the victim establish[ing] that she has suffered extraordinary psychological injury"), vacated on other grounds by Gilley v. United States, 543 U.S. 1104 , 125 S.Ct. 1033 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1018 (2005); United States v. Oliver, 118 F.3d 562, 567 (7th Cir.1997) (finding no error in the district court's decision to depart upward under § 5K2.3 based solely on "a psychologist's report establishing the psychological damage to the victim"); United States v. Anderson, 5 F.3d…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barton
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1, comment. (n.20(A)); see United States v. Houchins, 364 F.3d 182, 187-90 (4th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1104 , 125 S.Ct. 1004 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1018 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McCann
See United States v. McCann, 366 F.3d 46 (1st Cir.2004), cert. granted and judgment vacated by 543 U.S. 1104 , 125 S.Ct. 986 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1017 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramos
See also United States v. McCann, 366 F.3d 46 , 58 & n. 14 (1st Cir.2004) (noting that "the purposes underlying [§ 4A1.1], as expressed in the Introductory Comments to the criminal history section, [do not] support [the] assertion” that "a defendant's subjective knowledge concerning the sentence he is serving is at all relevant to the determination of his criminal history”), judgment vacated on other grounds by 543 U.S. 1104 , 125 S.Ct. 986 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1017 (2005). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sweat
v.
United States
v.
United States
04-5641.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 2005.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
SWEAT
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 04-5641.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 24, 2005.
1
C. A. 5th Cir.; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, ante, p. 220.