green
Positive treatment
11.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Harris
But see United States v. Lopez, 372 F.3d 86, 92 (2d Cir.2004) (holding *287 that mere theoretical possibility was not sufficient when "no evidence in the record connected that] possibility with reality”), vacated for reconsideration on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1613 , 161 L.Ed.2d 273 (2005).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Bowden
The Supreme Court moreover directed us to reconsider this case only “in light of United States v. Booker,” Bowden, 544 U.S. at 902, 125 S.Ct. 1615 , not with regard to any other matters.
cited
Cited "see"
Andrew Moore, Jr. v. B. Birkholz
See United States v. Pipkins, 378 F.3d 1281, 1285 (11th Cir. 2004), cert granted, judgment vacated, 544 U.S. 902 (2005), and opinion reinstated, 412 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Andrew Moore v. B. Birkholz
See United States v. Pipkins, 378 F.3d 1281, 1285 (11th Cir. 2004), cert granted, judgment vacated, 544 U.S. 902 (2005), and opinion reinstated, 412 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Omar Weise
Id. at 1179-80 ; see United States v. Pipkins, 378 F.3d 1281, 1295 (11th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 ,' 125 S.Ct. 1617 , 161 L.Ed.2d 275 (2005), and reinstated, 412 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir.2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Arturo Julian Duran
See United States v. Bowden , 380 F.3d 266, 269-71 (6th Cir. 2004)(holding that elderly father had apparent authority to consent to search of son’s garage and officers had no duty to determine the father’s “nexus to each individualized segment of the property prior to searching”), rev’d on other grounds , 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1615 , 161 L.Ed.2d 274 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Arturo Julian Duran
See United States v. Bowden, 380 F.3d 266, 269-71 (6th Cir. 2004)(holding that elderly father had apparent authority to consent to search of son’s garage and officers had no duty to determine the father’s “nexus to each individualized segment of the property prior to searching”), rev’d on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1615 , 161 L.Ed.2d 274 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Draper
See United States v. Lopez, 372 F.3d 86, 91 (2d Cir.2004), vacated for reconsideration on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1613 , 161 L.Ed.2d 273 (2005) (sustaining a witness tampering charge requires, in part, that the government show that the conduct the defendant believed would be discussed by the witness constitutes a federal offense).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Draper
See United States v. Lopez, 372 F.3d 86, 91 (2d Cir.2004), vacated for reconsideration on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1613 , 161 L.Ed.2d 273 (2005) (sustaining a witness tampering charge requires, in part, that the government show that the conduct the defendant believed would be discussed by the witness constitutes a federal offense).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lopez
See United States v. Lopez, 372 F.3d 86 (2d Cir.2004), vacated for reconsideration in tight of Booker by 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1613 , 161 L.Ed.2d 273 (2005) (mem.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Justin Evans
See United States v. Pipkins, 378 F.3d 1281, 1295 (11th Cir.2004) (holding that evidence that “pimps *1180 furnished their prostitutes with condoms manufactured out of state ... supports a finding that the activities of the enterprise affected interstate commerce”), vacated on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1617 , 161 L.Ed.2d 275 , opinion reinstated, 412 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 591 , 163 L.Ed.2d 492 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosalba Cisneros v. Petland, Inc.
See Williams v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 465 F.3d 1277 , 1284–85 (11th Cir. 2006) (finding sufficient a common purpose of making money by hiring undocumented immigrants), abrogated on other grounds as recognized in Simpson v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., 744 F.3d 702 , 714–15 (11th Cir. 2014); see also United States v. Pipkins, 378 F.3d 1281, 1290 (11th Cir. 2004) (“Pipkins agreed to participate in an enterprise, the overall objective of which was to make money prostituting juveniles.”), vacated, 544 U.S. 902 (2005), reinstated, 412 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Starrett, 55 F.3d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
Compare United States v. Harris, 498 F.3d 278, 286 (4th Cir. 2007) (“So long as the information the defendant seeks to suppress actually relates to the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, the federal nexus requirement is established[.]”), with United States v. Lopez, 372 F.3d 86, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2004), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 (2005) (requiring Government to show federal crime along with “‘additional appropriate evidence’” that “the victim plausibly might have turned to federal officials”); see also United States v. Bell, 113 F.3d 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
Compare United States v. Harris, 498 F.3d 278, 286 (4th Cir.2007) (“So long as the information the defendant seeks to suppress actually relates to the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, the federal nexus requirement is established[.]”), with United States v. Lopez, *139 372 F.3d 86, 91-92 (2d Cir.2004), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1613 , 161 L.Ed.2d 273 (2005) (requiring Government to show federal crime along with “ ‘additional appropriate evidence’ ” that “the victim plausibly might have turned to federal officials”); se…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fowler v. United States
(2×)
Compare United States v. Harris, 498 F. 3d 278, 286 (CA4 2007) (“So long as the information the defendant seeks to suppress actually relates to the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, the federal nexus requirement is estab lished”), with United States v. Lopez, 372 F. 3d 86 , 91–92 (CA2 2004), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 544 U. S. 902 (2005) (requiring Government to show federal crime along with “ ‘additional appropriate evidence’ ” that “the victim plausibly might have turned to federal offi cials”); see also United States v. Bell, 113 F. 3d 13…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Pipkins, 378 F.3d 1281, 1295 (11th Cir.2004) (suggesting pagers, telephones, and the Internet are per se instrumentalities of commerce, regardless of whether any interstate communications or routing occur), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 544 U.S. 902 , 125 S.Ct. 1617 , 161 L.Ed.2d 275 (2005), opinion reinstated on remand 412 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir.2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Meng Tuan Wang
v.
United States
v.
United States
04-8374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 2005.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
MENG TUAN WANG
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 04-8374.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 7, 2005.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).