Hart v. Multnomah Cnty., Oregon, 544 U.S. 993 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Hart v. Multnomah Cnty., Oregon, 544 U.S. 993 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vero Technical Support, Inc. v. United States (uscfc, 2010-09-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vero Technical Support, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 205-206 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993) (“[WJe read the statute [section 1500] as continuing to bar jurisdiction over the claim of a plaintiff who, upon filing, has an action pending in any other court ‘for or in respect to’ the same claim.”); see also Harbuck v. United States, 378 F.3d 1324, 1328 (Fed.Cir.) (quoting Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United States, 27 F.3d 1545, 1548 (Fed.Cir.1994)) (“ ‘The question of whether another claim is “pending” for pur poses of § 1500 is determined at the time at which the suit in the…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hart
v.
Multnomah County, Oregon
04-7050.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 2005.
544 U.S. 993
Published

544 U.S. 993

HART
v.
MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL..

No. 04-7050.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 18, 2005.

1

543 U. S. 1065. Petitions for rehearing denied.