green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jovan Simon
See United States v. Fox, 393 F.3d 52 , 61 n. 9 (1st Cir.2004) (holding that testimony implying officer had fabricated account of stop was material due to impeachment value), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2949 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hawkins
See United States v. Holbrook, 368 F.3d 415, 428 (4th Cir.2004) (citing United States v. Mc Queen, 108 F.3d 64, 66 (4th Cir.1997)), vacated on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2934 , 162 L.Ed.2d 863 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Horn
See United States v. Thomas, 389 F.3d 424 (3d Cir. 2004), vacated on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 (2005) (stating, in the context of a federal criminal trial, that defendants do not have a right to be “advised of possible defenses, such as voluntary intoxication, during [a] plea colloquy”); United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 573-74 (1989) (“Relinquishment derives not from any inquiry into a defendant’s subjective understanding of the range of potential defenses, but from the admissions necessarily made upon entry of a voluntary plea of guilty”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Horn
See United States v. Thomas, 389 F.3d 424 (3d Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2953 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005) (stating, in the context of a federal criminal trial, that defendants do not have a right to be “advised of possible defenses, such as voluntary intoxication, during [a] plea colloquy”); United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 573-74 , 109 S.Ct. 757 , 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989) (“Relinquishment derives not from any inquiry into a defendant’s subjective understanding of the range of potential defenses, but from the admissions necessarily made upon entry of…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theodore Richards
(2×)
United States v. Miller, 673 F.3d 688, 696 (7th Cir. 2012) (“[A]dmission of prior drug crimes to prove intent to commit present drug crimes has become too routine.”); see also United States v. Jones, 389 F.3d 753, 756-58 (7th Cir. 2004), vacated on other grounds by 545 U.S. 1125 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Farrell
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 402 F.3d 1303 , 1315 n. 7 (11th Cir.2005), vacated on other grounds by 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2938 , 162 L.Ed.2d 863 (2005); United States v. Cordery, 656 F.3d 1103, 1106 (10th Cir.2011); United States v. Ross, 77 F.3d 1525, 1539-40 (7th Cir. 1996); United States v. Crosgrove, 637 F.3d 646, 656-57 (6th Cir.2011); United States v. Gamez, 577 F.3d 394, 400 (2d Cir.2009) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cordery
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 402 F.3d 1303 , 1315 n. 7 (11th Cir.2005) vacated on other grounds by 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2938 , 162 L.Ed.2d 863 (2005); United States v. Ross, 77 F.3d 1525, 1539-40 (7th Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ford
See, e.g., United States v. Fox, 393 F.3d 52, 59 (1st Cir. 2004) (holding that “there was justification for stopping [defendant’s] vehicle” where officer “encountered a vehicle that appeared to be without a working plate light”), vacated on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 162 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stevens
Compare, e.g., United States v. Rodia, 194 F.3d 465, 474-82 (3d Cir. 1999) (upholding statute prohibiting intrastate possession of child pornography made with materials that had traveled in interstate commerce) with United States v. Smith, 402 F.3d 1303, 1315-16 (11th Cir. 2005) (finding the same statute unconstitutional), cert. granted and vacated, 545 U.S. 1125 (2005), and rev’d on remand, 459 F.3d 1276, 1284-85 (11th Cir. 2006) (upholding statute as proper exercise of Commerce Clause power in light of Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005)). 57 market for depictions of animal cruelty).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stevens
(2×)
Compare, e.g., United States v. Rodia, 194 F.3d 465, 474-82 (3d Cir.1999) (upholding statute prohibiting intrastate possession of child pornography made with materials that had traveled in interstate commerce) with United States v. Smith, 402 F.3d 1303, 1315-16 (11th Cir.2005) (finding the same statute unconstitutional), cer t. granted and vacated, 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2938 , 162 L.Ed.2d 863 (2005), and rev’d on remand, 459 F.3d 1276, 1284-85 (11th Cir.2006) (upholding statute as proper exercise of Commerce Clause power in light of Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 , 125 S.Ct. 2195 , 162 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oung
First, “Miranda warnings need not precede questions reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety or for the safety of arresting officers so long as the questioning relates to an objectively reasonable need to protect the police or the public from any immediate danger.” Id. (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Fox, 393 F.3d 52, 60 (1st Cir.2004), vac’d on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2949 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Smith
v.
Smith
No. 04-1390.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 2005.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Gonzales v. Raich, ante, p. 1.