green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
“robertson i”
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Noah Winstead v. J. Rivello
See DeFoy v. McCullough, 393 F.3d 439, 445 (3d Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1149 (2005) (finding that exhaustion applies only to parole denial claims alleging a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause); Shoop v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Parole, No. 1:25-CV-00943, 2025 WL 2178422 , at *7-8 (M.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bullock, III. v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole
See DeFoy v. McCullough, 393 F.3d 439, 445 (3d Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1149 (2005) (finding that exhaustion applies only to parole denial claims alleging a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause, which can be presented to the state courts through a mandamus action).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Jones
See Kelley v. Sec’y for Dep’t of Corr., 377 F.3d 1317, 1333-35 (11th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1149 (2005). records of this Court,2 the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Williams’s habeas corpus petition be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction due to Williams’s failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(3)(A).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colbert v. Union Pacific Railroad
See Felix v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 1156 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1149 , 125 S.Ct. 2961 , 162 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005); Meyer v. Conlon, 162 F.3d 1264 , 1268 n. 2 (10th Cir.1998); Carland v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Negron-Fuentes v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Compare Felix v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 1162 (10th Cir.2004), ce rt. denied, 545 U.S. 1149 , 125 S.Ct. 2961 , 162 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005), with Law v. Ernst & Young, 956 F.2d 364 , 370 n. 9 (1st Cir.1992). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tyler
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 04-10385.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 2005.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Alabama (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.