green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Gregg v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association as Trustee of the Cabana Series III Trust
See In re Villaje del Rio, Ltd., 283 F. App’x 263, 265 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 1046 (2008); Sullivan Cent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Hudson LL. (Meredith LL.--Mathew MM.)
Whether an unwed father is required to consent to an adoption is determined by “his manifestation of parental *907 responsibility [and,] [i]n the case of newborn infants [,] . . . the qualifying interest of an unwed father requires a willingness himself to assume full custody of the child — not merely to block adoption by others” (Matter of Raquel Marie X., 76 NY2d 387, 408 [1990], cert denied 498 US 984 [1990]). “[T]he manifestation of parental responsibility must be prompt” and such a manifestation of the ability and willingness to assume custody is measured in the “six continuin…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Parrilla
See Tri-State Fin., LLC. v. Lovald, 525 F.3d 649, 655 (8th Cir.2009), cert. denied 555 U.S. 1046 , 129 S.Ct. 630 , 172 L.Ed.2d 610 (2008); In re Claudio, 459 B.R. 500, 512 (Bankr.D.Mass.2011); In re First Software Corp., 79 B.R. 108, 111 (Bankr.D.Mass.1987); In re LaF-rance, 311 B.R. 1, 20-21 (Bankr.D.Ma.2004) (‘The court has an independent judicial responsibility, to review the fees of professionals, even in the absence of an objection by a party in interest.’)” In re Nales Perez, 506 B.R. 328, 331 (Bankr.D.P.R.2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Nales Perez
See Tri-State Fin., LLC v. Lovald, 525 F.3d 649, 655 (8th Cir.2008), cert. denied 555 U.S. 1046 , 129 S.Ct. 630 , 172 L.Ed.2d 610 (2008); In re Claudio, 459 B.R. 500, 512 (Bankr.D.Mass.2011); In re First Software Corp., 79 B.R. 108, 111 (Bankr.D.Mass.1987); In re LaFrance, 311 B.R. 1, 20-21 (Bankr.D.Mass.2004) (“The court has an independent judicial responsibility to review the fees of professionals, even in the absence of an objection by a party in interest.”) In the instant case, such statement was properly disclosed at Docket No. 1, p. 23, and Docket No. 116.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Fema Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability Litigation
For example, courts have foúnd no such “special relationship” to exist between friends, a lessee and lessor, or a university and an invitee, among others. 8 In the context of duty to warn, the Louisiana Supreme Court has stated that a “duty to disclose exists where the parties stand in some confidential or fiduciary relation to one another, such as that of principal and agent or executor and beneficiary of an estate.” Bunge Corp. v. GATX Corp., 557 So.2d 1376, 1383-84 (La.1990); see also Kadlec Medical Ctr. v. Lakeview Anesthesia Assocs., 527 F.3d 412, 420 (5th Cir.) (“In Louisiana,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHIPLEASE, INC.
v.
Jay A. STEINBERG, Chapter 7 Trustee
v.
Jay A. STEINBERG, Chapter 7 Trustee
No. 08-390.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 2008.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Case below, 528 F.3d 467.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.