green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2020–2023 · 2 courts ·
…turn to the article of the constitution of the united states, for the statute cannot extend the jurisdiction beyond the limits of the constitution.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1900 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1900
1963
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nunez v. Executive Le Soleil New York LLC
turn to the article of the constitution of the united states, for the statute cannot extend the jurisdiction beyond the limits of the constitution.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Env Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. v. ExxonMobil
turn to the article of the constitution of the united states, for the statute cannot extend the jurisdiction beyond the limits of the constitution.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Matimak Trading Co. v. Albert Khalily, D/B/A Unitex Mills, Inc., and D.A.Y. Kids Sportswear Inc.
he statute cannot extend the jurisdiction beyond the limits of the constitution.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
James Aren Duckett v. State of Florida
Comm’n, 109 So. 442, 445 (Fla. 1926) (internal quotations omitted); cf. Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 9 U.S. 303, 304 (1809); Verlinden B.V. v. Cent.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
BARRETT v. TRI-COAST PHARMACY, INC.
No. 1); and THE COURT NOTING that Plaintiff alleges that he is an “individual residing at 16 Hilltop Lane, Egg Harbor, New Jersey 08234” (id. at ¶ 1); and THE COURT NOTING that Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Tri-Coast Pharmacy, Inc. is “a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida” and that “operated at 14125 US Highway 1, Juno Beach, FL 33408” (id. at ¶¶ 2, 3); and THE COURT NOTING that Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Kevin O’Connell is an “individual and licensed pharmacist who upon information and belief currently resides at 16 Cottage Dr…
cited
Cited "see"
Demaree v. Castro
See Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 9 U.S. 303 , 304 (1809); Tagger v. Strauss Group Ltd., 951 F.3d 124, 126 (2d Cir. 2020); Steiner v. Atochem, S.A., 70 Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Alexanian v. FCA US, LLC
See id. at 58–61 (discussing 21 legislative history and Congressional intent).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyrone Davis
(2×)
See id. at 491 , 103 S.Ct. 1962 (“This Court’s cases firmly establish that Congress may not expand the jurisdiction of the federal courts beyond the bounds established by the Constitution.” (citing Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 9 U.S. 303 , 5 Cranch 303 , 3 L.Ed. 108 (1809); Kline v. Burke Constr.
discussed
Cited "see"
H.K. Huilin International Trade Co. v. Kevin Multiline Polymer Inc.
See Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 303 , 303, 3 L.Ed. 108 (1809) (implying that the 1789 Judiciary Act could not constitutionally be read to grant jurisdiction over suits between only two aliens); Mossman v. Higginson, 4 U.S. (4 Dali.) 12, 14, 1 L.Ed. 720 (1800) (“[T]he legislative power of conferring jurisdiction of the federal Courts[ ] is ... confined to suits between citizens and foreigners.”); cf. Fallon et al., supra, at 1363-64 & n. 3 (highlighting these constitutional concerns). 3 Were this court operating without further guidance, it would be forced to tackle the tension …
cited
Cited "see"
Intec USA v. Engle, Jonathan
See Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 5 Cranch 303 , 3 L.Ed. 108 (1809); Mossman v. Higginson, 4 Dall. 12 , 1 L.Ed. 720 (1800).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hideo Matsuda v. Michiko Wada
(2×)
See Hodgson, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) at 303 (finding no jurisdiction over action between two aliens); Arai v. Tachibana, 778 F.Supp. 1535, 1538 (D.Haw.1991) (Ezra, J.) (“the federal judicial power cannot extend to cases involving solely aliens”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Trans American Trucking Service, Inc.
(2×)
See Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 5 Cranch 303 , 9 U.S. 303 , 3 L.Ed. 108 (1809); 13B Wright & Miller § 3604.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stella Perez
See United States v. Bornstein, 423 ___ _____________ _________ -9- 9 U.S. 303, 309 (1976) (false claim may be presented through an innocent third party); United States ex rel.
examined
Cited "see"
Hanoch Tel-Oren, in His Capacity as Father, on Behalf of the Deceased, Imry Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic Hanoch Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic
(4×)
See Hodgson & Thompson v. Bowerbank, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 303 , 3 L.Ed. 108 (1809) 10 It might also be argued that Sec. 1350 addressed actions for tortious violations only of the law of nations, not domestic law, and that the 1789 Act's grant of diversity jurisdiction covered domestic torts only.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Mexico City Aircrash of October 31, 1979 Consolidated Proceedings. Gary Steve Haley, as Heir and of Deceased Theresa Yoriko Sugano Haley, Gary Steven Haley, Special Administrator for the Estate of Theresa Yoriko Sugano Haley v. Western Airlines, Inc., Blanca Estela Paz Tovar, Heir and of Deceased Regina Patricia Tovar Blanca Estela Paz Tovar, Special Administrator for the Estate of Regina Patricia Tovar, Anthony John Dzida, as Heir and of Deceased Vikki Dzida, Anthony John Dzida, Special Administrator for the Estate of Vikki Dzida, Plaintiff v. Western Airlines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, McDonnell Douglas Company, Inc., a Maryland Corporation Estate of Charles Gilbert Sperry-Rand, Inc., Sunstrand Data Control, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Bendix Corporation, Flight Systems Division, a Delaware Corporation Rockwell International, Inc. Collins Air Transport Division, a Foreign Corporation Thompson, C.F.S., a Foreign Corporation
See Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 303 , 3 L.Ed. 108 (1809); Hodas v. Lindsay, 431 F.Supp. 637, 640 (S.D.N.Y.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Haley v. Western Airlines, Inc.
See Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 303 , 3 L.Ed. 108 (1809); Hodas v. Lindsay, 431 F.Supp. 637, 640 (S.D.N.Y.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Navarro Savings Assn. v. Lee
(2×)
McNutt v. Bland, 2 How., at 13-14 ; see Browne v. Strode, 5 Cranch 303 (1809).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of Nigeria
See, e. g., Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 5 Cranch 303 (1809); Kline v. Burke Construction Co., 260 U. S. 226, 234 (1922).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Browne and Others
v.
Strode
v.
Strode
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 1, 1809.
Cited by 47 opinions | Published
The Court ordered it to be certified, as their opinion, that the court below has jurisdiction in the case.