California Codes

Cal. Corporations Code § 7231.5 (2026)

Standards of Conduct

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Except as provided in Section 7233 or 7236, there is no monetary liability on the part of, and no cause of action for damages shall arise against, any volunteer director or volunteer executive officer of a nonprofit corporation subject to this part based upon any alleged failure to discharge the person’s duties as a director or officer if the duties are performed in a manner that meets all of the following criteria:

(1)The duties are performed in good faith.

(2)The duties are performed in a manner such director or officer believes to be in the best interests of the corporation.

(3)The duties are performed with such care, including reasonable inquiry, as an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances.

(b)“Volunteer” means the rendering of services without compensation. “Compensation” means remuneration whether by way of salary, fee, or other consideration for services rendered. However, the payment of per diem, mileage, or other reimbursement expenses to a director or executive officer does not affect that person’s status as a volunteer within the meaning of this section.

(c)“Executive officer” means the president, vice president, secretary, or treasurer of a corporation or other individual serving in like capacity who assists in establishing the policy of the corporation.

(d)This section shall apply only to trade, professional, and labor organizations incorporated pursuant to this part which operate exclusively for fraternal, educational, and other nonprofit purposes, and under the provisions of Section 501(c) of the United States Internal Revenue Code.

(e)This section shall not be construed to limit the provisions of Section 7231.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2022 · leading case: Ritter & Ritter, Inc. Pension & Profit Plan v. the Churchill Condo. Assn., 166 Cal. App. 4th 103 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008).
Ritter & Ritter, Inc. Pension & Profit Plan v. the Churchill Condo. Assn., 166 Cal. App. 4th 103 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “based upon any alleged failure to discharge the person's duties as a director" of a nonprofit organization if that person (1) performs the duties of office in good faith; (2) performs the duties of office in a manner believed to be in the best interests of the corporation; and…”
Sarah-jane Parker (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2022). “The business judgment rule, including as reflected in California Corporations Code section 7231.5(a), provides a defense to directors or officers for claims brought by or on behalf of the organization they represent, in this instance BCOA, for breach of duties owed to that…”
Cal. Corporations Code § 7231.5(a): 1 case
Sarah-jane Parker (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2022). “The business judgment rule, including as reflected in California Corporations Code section 7231.5(a), provides a defense to directors or officers for claims brought by or on behalf of the organization they represent, in this instance BCOA, for breach of duties owed to that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.