California Codes
Cal. Evidence Code § 1033 (2026)
Clergy Penitent Privileges
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Subject to Section 912, a penitent, whether or not a party, has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a penitential communication if he or she claims the privilege.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2025 · leading case: Roman Cath. Archbishop of La v. Super. Ct., 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 209 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005).
Roman Cath. Archbishop of La v. Super. Ct., 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 209 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005). “Code, § 1031); "[s]ubject to [Evidence Code] Section 912, a penitent, whether or not a party, has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a penitential communication if he or she claims the privilege" (Evid.Code, § 1033); and, "[s]ubject to…”
Gonzalez v. State, 45 S.W.3d 101 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). “” Cal. Evid.Code § 1033. A "penitential communication" is "a communication made in confidence, in the presence of no third person so far as the penitent is aware, to a clergyman, who in the course or practice of his church, denomination, or organization, is authorized or…”
People v. Cannata, 233 Cal. App. 4th 1113 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). “Code, § 970) and the clergy-penitent privilege (Evid. Code, § 1033), are contained in the Evidence Code to protect the privacy of certain confidential relationships.”
Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Superior Court, 131 Cal. App. 4th 417 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005). “Code, § 1031); “[s]ubject to [Evidence Code] Section 912, a penitent, whether or not a party, has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a penitential communication if he or she claims the privilege” (Evid. Code, § 1033); and, “[sjubject to…”
In Re Edward D., 61 Cal. App. 3d 10 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976). “Code, § 994), the privilege of the penitent (Evid. Code, § 1033), the privilege of the clergyman (Evid.”
State v. Price, 26 N.W.3d 70 (Neb. 2025). “Under Cal. Evid. Code § 1033 (West 2009), “Subject to Section 912, a penitent, whether or not a party, has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a penitential communication if he or she claims the privilege.”
Los Angeles Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. Janet D., 61 Cal. App. 3d 10 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976). “Code, § 994), the privilege of the penitent (Evid. Code, § 1033), the privilege of the clergyman (Evid.”
Welch v. Brown, 58 F. Supp. 3d 1079 (E.D. Cal. 2014). “Because SB 1172 is limited to "mental health providers” as defined in the statute, it *1092 does not appear to extend to a "member of the clergy” as contemplated by penitent or clergy privileges in California Evidence Code sections 1033 and 1034.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.