California Codes

Cal. Government Code § 11425.40 (2026)

Administrative Adjudication Bill of Rights

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)The presiding officer is subject to disqualification for bias, prejudice, or interest in the proceeding.

(b)It is not alone or in itself grounds for disqualification, without further evidence of bias, prejudice, or interest, that the presiding officer:

(1)Is or is not a member of a racial, ethnic, religious, sexual, or similar group and the proceeding involves the rights of that group.

(2)Has experience, technical competence, or specialized knowledge of, or has in any capacity expressed a view on, a legal, factual, or policy issue presented in the proceeding.

(3)Has as a lawyer or public official participated in the drafting of laws or regulations or in the effort to pass or defeat laws or regulations, the meaning, effect, or application of which is in issue in the proceeding.

(c)The provisions of this section governing disqualification of the presiding officer also govern disqualification of the agency head or other person or body to which the power to hear or decide in the proceeding is delegated.

(d)An agency that conducts an adjudicative proceeding may provide by regulation for peremptory challenge of the presiding officer.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2002–2010 · leading case: State Water Resources Control Bd. Cases, 39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 189 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006).
State Water Resources Control Bd. Cases, 39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 189 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006). “(Gov. Code, § 11425.40, subds. (a), (c); Cal.”
Cnty. of San Diego v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd., 184 Cal. App. 4th 396 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “) Government Code section 11425.40 is part of the administrative adjudication bill of rights that governs the procedure by which an agency conducts an adjudicative proceeding under the APA.”
CMPB FRIENDS, INC. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd., 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 914 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “, Gov.Code, §§ 11425.40, 11512, subd. (c).) We cannot presume bias simply because the Department appointed the administrative law judge.”
J.W. Ex Rel. J.E.W. v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist., 570 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (E.D. Cal. 2008). “Cal. Gov.Code § 11425.40(d); 1 CaLCode of Regs.”
Cal. Government Code § 11425.40(d): 1 case
J.W. Ex Rel. J.E.W. v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist., 570 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (E.D. Cal. 2008). “Cal. Gov.Code § 11425.40(d); 1 CaLCode of Regs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.