California Codes
Cal. Government Code § 3517.5 (2026)
State Employer-Employee Relations
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
If agreement is reached between the Governor and the recognized employee organization, they shall jointly prepare a written memorandum of such understanding which shall be presented, when appropriate, to the Legislature for determination.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2007–2019 · leading case: Stoetzl v. Dept. of Human Resources, 443 P.3d 924 (Cal. 2019).
Stoetzl v. Dept. of Human Resources, 443 P.3d 924 (Cal. 2019). “Specifically, they agreed to four hours' pay for "pre and post work activities" in a recurring 28-day work period, and the record supports the trial court's finding that the phrase "pre and post work activities" was used by the parties to refer to duty-integrated walk time.”
Dep't of Pers. Admin. v. California Corr. Peace Officers Ass'n, 62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 110 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). “” (Gov. Code, § 3517.5.) Government Code section 3517.”
Stoetzl v. State, 222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 728 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017). “The Dills Act allows parties to agree to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to supersede certain provisions of law.”
California Dep't of Human Resources v. Serv. Employees Int'l Union, 209 Cal. App. 4th 1420 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). “” (Gov. Code, § 3517.5.) The State acknowledges that the Plata order did not need legislative approval due to “federal supremacy principles.”
Stoetzl v. State of California, No. A142832 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2017). “(Gov. Code, § 3517.5.) The FLSA establishes overtime pay requirements for hours worked in excess of 40 per week.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.