Cal. Codes » Government Code / TITLE 1. GENERAL / DIVISION 4. PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES / CHAPTER 10.7. Meeting and Negotiating in Public Educational Employment / ARTICLE 4. Rights, Obligations, Prohibitions, and Unfair Practices
California Codes

Cal. Government Code § 3543.3 (2026)

Rights, Obligations, Prohibitions, and Unfair Practices

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A public school employer or such representatives as it may designate who may, but need not be, subject to either certification requirements or requirements for classified employees set forth in the Education Code, shall meet and negotiate with and only with representatives of employee organizations selected as exclusive representatives of appropriate units upon request with regard to matters within the scope of representation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1996–2014 · leading case: Bd. of Educ. of the Round Valley Unified Sch. Dist. v. Round Valley Teachers Ass'n, 914 P.2d 193 (Cal. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Educ. of the Round Valley Unified Sch. Dist. v. Round Valley Teachers Ass'n, 914 P.2d 193 (Cal. 1996). “” (Gov. Code, § 3543.3.) The scope of this duty is limited to “matters relating to wages, hours of employment, and other terms and conditions of employment.”
Sunnyvale Unified Sch. Dist. v. Jacobs, 171 Cal. App. 4th 168 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “” (Gov. Code, § 3543.3), the scope of representation is limited.”
Governing Bd. of Ripon Unified Sch. Dist. v. Comm'n on Prof'l Competence, 177 Cal. App. 4th 1379 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “” (Gov. Code, § 3543.3.) The scope of representation is limited by statute to “matters relating to wages, hours of employment, and other terms and conditions of employment” as defined.”
Anaheim Union High Sch. Dist. v. Am. Fed. of State & Cnty. & Mun. Employees, 222 Cal. App. 4th 887 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “) The EERA requires a public school employer to meet and negotiate with its employees’ exclusive representative concerning “matters within the scope of representation” (Gov. Code, § 3543.3) and permits the employer and the representative to enter into a written agreement…”
Anaheim Union High Sch. v. Am. Fed'n etc., Local 3112, No. G047597 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 3, 2014). “) The EERA requires a public school employer to meet and negotiate with its employees’ exclusive representative concerning “matters within the scope of representation” (Gov. Code, § 3543.3) and permits the employer and the representative to enter into a written agreement…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.