Cal. Codes » Government Code / TITLE 7.2. SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION / CHAPTER 4. Powers and Duties of the Commission
California Codes

Cal. Government Code § 66632.1 (2026)

Powers and Duties of the Commission

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this title shall apply to any project where necessary local governmental approval and a Department of the Army Corps of Engineers permit have been obtained to allow commencement of the diking or filling process, and where such diking or filling process has commenced prior to the effective date of this title, nor to the continuation of dredging under existing Department of the Army Corps of Engineers permits.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1968–1976 · leading case: People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Dev. Comm'n v. Town of Emeryville, 446 P.2d 790 (Cal. 1968).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Dev. Comm'n v. Town of Emeryville, 446 P.2d 790 (Cal. 1968). · cites it 2× “(Gov. Code, § 66632.1.) 1 The court entered judgment for Emeryville and dissolved an injunction which had theretofore restrained the town from conducting further fill activities.”
Oceanic California, Inc. v. North Cent. Coast Reg'l Comm'n, 63 Cal. App. 3d 57 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976). “That case did not involve a vested right but merely a “grandfather clause” (Gov. Code, § 66632.1) which exempted certain projects which had already been commenced under specific permits.”
Urban Renewal Agency v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Comm'n, 542 P.2d 645 (Cal. 1975). “In Emeryville we suggested that the term “project” was a term of limitation, requiring “a detailed and specific plan prepared in furtherance of a determination to accomplish a certáin objective. A determination without a concrete plan is not a ‘project’ because the means of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.