California Codes

Cal. Labor Code § 1183 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)So far as practicable, the commission, by mail, shall send a copy of the order authorized by Section 1182 to each employer in the occupation or industry in question, and each employer shall post a copy of the order in the building in which employees affected by the order are employed. The commission shall also send a copy of the order to each employer registering his or her name with the commission for that purpose, but failure to mail the order or notice of the order to any employer affected by the order shall not relieve the employer from the duty of complying with the order.

(b)The commission shall prepare a summary of the regulations contained in its orders. The summary shall be printed on the first page of the document containing the full text of the order. The summary shall include a brief description of the following subjects of the orders: minimum wage, hours and days of work, reporting time, pay records, cash shortages and breakage, uniforms and equipment, meals and lodging, meal and rest periods, and seats. The summary shall also include information as to how to contact the field office of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, how to obtain a copy of the full text of the order and the statement as to the basis for the order, and any other information the commission deems necessary. The commission, at its discretion, may prepare a separate summary for each order or any combination of orders, or it may incorporate the regulations of all its orders into a single summary.

(c)A finding by the commission that there has been publication of any action taken by the commission as required by Section 1182.1 is conclusive as to the obligation of an employer to comply with the order.

(d)Every employer who is subject to an order of the commission shall post a copy of the order and keep it posted in a conspicuous location frequented by employees during the hours of the workday.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1996–2019 · leading case: Oto, L. L.C. v. Kho, 447 P.3d 680 (Cal. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Oto, L. L.C. v. Kho, 447 P.3d 680 (Cal. 2019). “, tit. 8, § 11040 ); IWC wage order No. MW-2019 ( Cal.”

Tidewater Marine W., Inc. v. Bradshaw, 927 P.2d 296 (Cal. 1996). “1) and mail copies of new regulations to affected employers (Lab. Code, § 1183). Any aggrieved person may apply within 20 days for a rehearing.”

Cole v. CRST, Inc., 317 F.R.D. 141 (C.D. Cal. 2016). “See Cal. Labor Code § 1183 (d). Defendant fulfilled this obligation by posting the relevant rules at its terminals.”

Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC, 188 F. Supp. 3d 1016 (S.D. Cal. 2016). “See Cal. Labor Code § 1183 (d). Penske fulfilled this obligation by posting Wage Order No.”

Cole v. CRST, Inc., 150 F. Supp. 3d 1163 (C.D. Cal. 2015). “See Cal. Labor Code § 1183 (d); Perez v. Safety-Kleen Sys.”

Oto, L.L.C. v. Kho (Cal. 2019). “Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) wage orders, required by law to be posted at the jobsite (Lab. Code, § 1183, subd. (d)), direct employees to contact the Labor Commissioner about wage-related violations, providing for this purpose both the Department of Industrial Relations…”

Clodoaldo Antemate v. Estenson Logistics, LLC (C.D. Cal. 2019). “See Cal. Lab. Code § 1183 (d). 15. There was no evidence that any Class Member delayed, shortened, or missed a meal or rest break because of any alleged defect in Estenson’s meal and rest break policies.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.