California Codes
Cal. Penal Code § 1237.5 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
No appeal shall be taken by the defendant from a judgment of conviction upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or a revocation of probation following an admission of violation, except where both of the following are met:
(a)The defendant has filed with the trial court a written statement, executed under oath or penalty of perjury showing reasonable constitutional, jurisdictional, or other grounds going to the legality of the proceedings.
(b)The trial court has executed and filed a certificate of probable cause for such appeal with the clerk of the court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 387
cases (57 in the last 5 years), 1966–2026 · leading case: People v. Edwards, 757 N.E.2d 442 (Ill. 2001).
People v. Edwards, 757 N.E.2d 442 (Ill. 2001). “" Cal.Penal Code § 1237.5 (West 2000). California law, unlike the law of this state, does not require a defendant to file a motion to withdraw his guilty plea.”
People v. Stamps, 467 P.3d 168 (Cal. 2020). “We hold defendant was not required to obtain a certificate of probable cause (Pen. Code, § 1237.5) to claim on appeal that the new law applied to him retroactively, and that the new law applies because his case is not yet final on appeal.”
People v. Shelton, 125 P.3d 290 (Cal. 2006). “412(b), preclude appellant from raising a Penal Code section 654 challenge on appeal?" II Did defendant need to apply for and obtain a certificate of probable cause before he could raise on appeal his claim of trial court sentencing error under Penal Code section 654? Penal Code…”
People v. Buttram, 69 P.3d 420 (Cal. 2003). “I do believe, however, that the current "certificate of probable cause" system for discouraging baseless appeals from negotiated pleas (Pen.Code, § 1237.5; [1] Cal. Rules of Court, rule 31(d) (rule 31(d)) is not working well.”
Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338 (9th Cir. 2010). “See Cal. Penal Code § 1237.5 (a) (stating that individuals who enter guilty pleas may appeal on the basis of “reasonable constitutional, juris- dictional, or other grounds going to the legality of the pro- ceedings.”
People v. Joseph B., 671 P.2d 852 (Cal. 1983). “Must a minor who admits a juvenile court petition secure a certificate of probable cause (Pen. Code, § 1237.5) to obtain appellate review of any errors committed before or in the process? I.”
People v. McCullough, 298 P.3d 860 (Cal. 2013). “(Pen. Code, § 1237.5.) Defendant’s appeal included a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the $270.”
Neuhaus v. People, 289 P.3d 19 (Colo. 2012). “Ten jurisdictions authorize conditional guilty pleas by statute: see Cal.Penal Code §§ 1237.5 & 1538.5(m); Conn.”
People v. Zackery, 54 Cal. Rptr. 3d 198 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). “” In the unpublished part of our opinion, we conclude that the question whether the judge coerced defendant into pleading guilty must be raised via a petition for writ of habeas corpus because the judge denied defendant’s request for a certificate of probable cause.”
People v. Superior Court of Yolo Cnty., 10 Cal. App. 5th 1316 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017). “(Pen. Code, § 1237.5; Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.”
Glenn v. Commonwealth, 642 S.E.2d 282 (Va. Ct. App. 2007). “3(b); Cal.Penal Code § 1237.5 & Cal.App. R. 30(b); People v.”
People v. Padfield, 136 Cal. App. 3d 218 (Cal. Ct. App. 1982). “I Penal Code section 1237.5 provides: “No appeal shall be taken by defendant from a judgment of conviction upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or a revocation of probation following an admission of *224 violation, except where: [If] (a) The defendant has filed with the…”
— Cal. Penal Code § 1237.5(a) — 4 cases
People v. Edwards, 757 N.E.2d 442 (Ill. 2001). “" Cal.Penal Code § 1237.5 (West 2000). California law, unlike the law of this state, does not require a defendant to file a motion to withdraw his guilty plea.”
Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338 (9th Cir. 2010). “See Cal. Penal Code § 1237.5 (a) (stating that individuals who enter guilty pleas may appeal on the basis of “reasonable constitutional, juris- dictional, or other grounds going to the legality of the pro- ceedings.”
Hebbe v. Pliler, 611 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2010).
Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338 (9th Cir. 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.