California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 1237 (2026)

Appeals, When Allowed and How Taken, and the Effect Thereof

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An appeal may be taken by the defendant from both of the following:

(a)Except as provided in Sections 1237.1, 1237.2, and 1237.5, from a final judgment of conviction. A sentence, an order granting probation, or the commitment of a defendant for insanity, the indeterminate commitment of a defendant as a mentally disordered sex offender, or the commitment of a defendant for controlled substance addiction shall be deemed to be a final judgment within the meaning of this section. Upon appeal from a final judgment the court may review any order denying a motion for a new trial.

(b)From any order made after judgment, affecting the substantial rights of the party.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 618 cases (66 in the last 5 years), 1945–2026 · leading case: People v. Kelly, 146 P.3d 547 (Cal. 2006).
People v. Kelly, 146 P.3d 547 (Cal. 2006). · cites it 4× “2d 716 ; Pen.Code, § 1237. [2] ) Having provided *107 criminal defendants with an appeal as a matter of right, the states must provide indigent defendants with the assistance of counsel on appeal, "[f]or there can be no equal justice where the kind of an appeal a man enjoys…”
People v. McKenzie, 459 P.3d 25 (Cal. 2020). · cites it 2× “) Penal Code section 1237, subdivision (a), provides in relevant part that a defendant may 5 PEOPLE v.”
People v. Stamps, 467 P.3d 168 (Cal. 2020). “” (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. (a).) However, if the judgment resulted from a guilty or no contest plea, Penal Code4 section 1237.”
People v. Superior Court of Yolo Cnty., 10 Cal. App. 5th 1316 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “) Penal Code section 1237 delineates when a defendant may appeal from a final judgment of conviction.”
People v. Panizzon, 913 P.2d 1061 (Cal. 1996). · cites it 2× “(Pen. Code, § 1237.) If they can waive this right at all, they must do so "knowing[ly], intelligent[ly] and voluntar[il]y.”
People v. Serrano, 211 Cal. App. 4th 496 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). “2d 716 ]; Pen. Code, §1237.) “Having provided criminal defendants with an appeal as a matter of right, [California] must provide indigent defendants with the assistance of counsel on appeal .”
People v. Disbrow, 545 P.2d 272 (Cal. 1976). · cites it 2× “(1a) He appeals from the judgment (Pen. Code, § 1237), predicating error on the use of certain evidence to impeach his testimony at trial.”
People v. Ramirez, 599 P.2d 622 (Cal. 1979). · cites it 2× “(Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1; People v. Flores (1974) 12 Cal.”
People v. Collins, 722 P.2d 173 (Cal. 1986). · cites it 2× “If the court finds no prejudice it should reinstate the judgment; from this judgment the defendant can appeal (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. (a)). If the court finds prejudice, it should order a new trial; from this order the People can appeal.”
People v. Cook, 583 P.2d 130 (Cal. 1978). · cites it 2× “He appeals from the *78 judgment (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1), attacking only the legality of the search (Pen.”
Curtis Clayton v. Martin Biter, 868 F.3d 840 (9th Cir. 2017). “” Cal. Penal Code § 1237 . The California Supreme Court has concluded that a denial of a resentencing petition under section 1170.”
People v. Thomas, 573 P.2d 433 (Cal. 1978). · cites it 2× “Defendant Charlie Thomas appeals from an order granting probation (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1) following convictions of three counts of committing lewd and lascivious acts on the body of a child under the age of 14 years ( id.”
Cal. Penal Code § 1237(1): 1 case
People v. Bittick, 177 Cal. App. 2d 479 (Cal. Ct. App. 1960).
Cal. Penal Code § 1237(a): 2 cases
United States v. Vicente Corona, 493 F. App'x 645 (6th Cir. 2012).
Alfred Villaneda v. James Tilton, 432 F. App'x 695 (9th Cir. 2011).
Cal. Penal Code § 1237(b): 2 cases
In re Det. of Petersen, 980 P.2d 1204 (Wash. 1999).
People v. Roberts, No. A168954 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 20, 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.