Upon the express consent of both the people and the defendant, in lieu of issuing an order terminating an action the court may proceed on the existing accusatory pleading. For the purposes of Section 1387, the action shall be deemed as having been previously terminated. The defendant shall be rearraigned on the accusatory pleading and a new time period pursuant to Section 859b or 1382 shall commence.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2021 · leading case:
Paredes v. Superior Court, 91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 350 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999).
Paredes v. Superior Court, 91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 350 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “) As relevant, Penal Code section 1387.2 provides that “[u]pon the express consent of both the people and the defendant, in lieu of issuing an order terminating an action the court may proceed on the existing accusatory pleading.”
People v. Trone CA2/8 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021).
“The defendant waived time postponing his statutory speedy trial right which would have 2 Penal Code section 1387.2 provides: “Upon the express consent of both the people and the defendant, in lieu of issuing an order terminating an action the court may proceed on the existing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.