A person is guilty of aggravated mayhem when he or she unlawfully, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the physical or psychological well-being of another person, intentionally causes permanent disability or disfigurement of another human being or deprives a human being of a limb, organ, or member of his or her body. For purposes of this section, it is not necessary to prove an intent to kill. Aggravated mayhem is a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for life with the possibility of parole.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
34
cases (
9 in the last 5 years), 1990–2026 · leading case:
State v. Quintana, 2008 WI 33 (Wis. 2008).
State v. Quintana, 2008 WI 33 (Wis. 2008).
“1-14, 24 (August 31, 1999). 15 Only a few modern day criminal codes retain the stand alone crime of mayhem.”
People v. Lee, 220 Cal. App. 3d 320 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 2× “(Pen. Code, §§ 205, 203, 245, subd. (a)(1).”
People v. Robinson, 232 Cal. App. 4th 69 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).
“PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant was charged with aggravated mayhem (count 1; Pen. Code, § 205); 1 torture (count 2; § 206); mayhem (count 3; § 203); assault with a deadly weapon, to wit, boiling water, and by force likely to cause great bodily injury (count 4; § 245, subd.”
People v. Rivas, 238 Cal. App. 4th 967 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015).
“The jury convicted both defendants of aggravated mayhem (Pen. Code, § 205), assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen.”
In re Audrey B. CA3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 2× “Following the recent incident of domestic violence, father was arrested and charged with two counts of corporal injury to a spouse or cohabitant and single charges of aggravated mayhem (Pen. Code, § 205) and torture (id., § 206).”
People v. Rivas (Cal. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “The jury convicted both defendants of aggravated mayhem (Pen. Code, § 205), assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen.”
People v. Duran CA2/8 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
“In addition to attempted first degree murder, Duran had been charged with aggravated mayhem (Pen. Code, § 205).3 The information also alleged various sentencing enhancements, two of which are relevant here: a five-year enhancement based on Duran’s previous conviction of a…”
People v. Arana CA1/2 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
“Factual Background The trial court instructed the jury on aggravated mayhem with CALCRIM No.”
People v. Arana CA1/2 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
“Factual Background The trial court instructed the jury on aggravated mayhem with CALCRIM No.”
People v. Pitchford CA4/2 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
“The jury found defendant guilty of aggravated mayhem (Pen. Code, § 205,1 count 3) and torture (§ 206, count 4), and found true that he personally used a deadly weapon in committing those offenses (§ 12022.”
People v. Coe CA3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021).
“” Verdicts and Sentencing The jury found defendant guilty of aggravated mayhem (Pen. Code, § 205)1, arson causing great bodily injury (§ 451, subd.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.