(a)Whenever an authorized member of a public agency directs the storage of a vehicle, as permitted by this chapter, or upon the storage of a vehicle as permitted under this section (except as provided in subdivision (f) or (g)), the agency or person directing the storage shall provide the vehicle’s registered and legal owners of record, or their agents, with the opportunity for a poststorage hearing to determine the validity of the storage.
(b)A notice of the storage shall be mailed or personally delivered to the registered and legal owners within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays, and shall include all of the following information:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the agency providing the notice.
(2)The location of the place of storage and description of the vehicle, which shall include, if available, the name or make, the manufacturer, the license plate number, and the mileage.
(3)The authority and purpose for the removal of the vehicle.
(4)A statement that, in order to receive their poststorage hearing, the owners, or their agents, shall request the hearing in person, writing, or by telephone within 10 days of the date appearing on the notice.
(c)The poststorage hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours of the request, excluding weekends and holidays. The public agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who directed the storage of the vehicle.
(d)Failure of either the registered or legal owner, or his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall satisfy the poststorage hearing requirement.
(e)The agency employing the person who directed the storage shall be responsible for the costs incurred for towing and storage if it is determined in the poststorage hearing that reasonable grounds for the storage are not established.
(f)This section does not apply to vehicles abated under the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program pursuant to Sections 22660 to 22668, inclusive, and Section 22710, or to vehicles impounded for investigation pursuant to Section 22655, or to vehicles removed from private property pursuant to Section 22658.
(g)This section does not apply to abandoned vehicles removed pursuant to Section 22669 that are determined by the public agency to have an estimated value of five hundred dollars ($500) or less.
Notes of Decisions
Rafael Sandoval v. Cnty. of Sonoma, 912 F.3d 509 (9th Cir. 2018).
“Cal. Vehicle Code § 22852 (c). Due process does not demand a full- blown jury trial in this context, but it surely entitles an owner to a hearing before a neutral decision-maker.”
Hupp v. City of Walnut Creek, 389 F. Supp. 2d 1229 (N.D. Cal. 2005).
· cites it 3× “Although plaintiff provides no authority that Cal. Veh.Code §§ 22651(h)(1) and 22852 are unconstitutional, he appears to base his claim on the following arguments: Cal.”
Clement v. City of Glendale, 518 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2008).
“Cal. Veh.Code § 22852(c). If the owner is successful in his challenge, the car will presumably be released without the payment of any fees.”
State v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cnty., 4 Cal. App. 5th 94 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
“(Veh. Code, § 22852.) PROCEDURAL HISTORY In an April 14, 2014 letter, Flynn requested that the State Department of Justice (the DOJ) and the CHP produce electronically stored data derived from CHP 180 forms pursuant to the CPRA.”
Mateos-Sandoval v. Cnty. of Sonoma, 942 F. Supp. 2d 890 (N.D. Cal. 2013).
“” Cal. Veh. Code § 22852 (c). B. Mateos-Sandoval Plaintiffs allege that, on January 27, 2011, Mateos-Sandoval was driving his GMC Sierra pickup truck on Santa Rosa avenue when a Sonoma County Sheriffs Department (SCSD) deputy pulled him over.”
Juan Salazar v. City of Maywood, 414 F. App'x 73 (9th Cir. 2011).
· cites it 2× “The district court also did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ late motion for class certification because it appropriately found that plaintiffs failed to show good cause for missing the deadline.”
Cnty. of Los Angeles v. Superior Court, 242 Cal. App. 4th 475 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015).
“The notice will include the following information: name, address, and telephone number of the agency providing the notice; the authority and purpose of the removal of the vehicle; the location of the place of storage/impound and description of the vehicle; how the vehicle may be…”
Thompson v. Petaluma Police Dept. CA1/4, 231 Cal. App. 4th 101 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).
“6 in its notice, give the factual basis for the impound, or provide the evidence that the City plans to use at the hearing. The CHP-180 form’s references to section 14602.”
People v. Martinez, 118 Cal. App. 3d 624 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981).
“(Veh. Code, § 22852.) If the arrest was valid, probable cause is established.”
People v. 6344 Skyway, Paradise, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3136 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999).
“Code, § 22851), unless he can prove that probable cause for towing and impounding his car did not exist, in which event the towing and storage costs are generally borne by the law enforcement entity responsible for the towing (Veh.”
— Cal. Vehicle Code § 22852(a) — 1 case
— Cal. Vehicle Code § 22852(b) — 4 cases
Hupp v. City of Walnut Creek, 389 F. Supp. 2d 1229 (N.D. Cal. 2005).
“Although plaintiff provides no authority that Cal. Veh.Code §§ 22651(h)(1) and 22852 are unconstitutional, he appears to base his claim on the following arguments: Cal.”
Juan Salazar v. City of Maywood, 414 F. App'x 73 (9th Cir. 2011).
“The district court also did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ late motion for class certification because it appropriately found that plaintiffs failed to show good cause for missing the deadline.”
— Cal. Vehicle Code § 22852(b)(4) — 2 cases
— Cal. Vehicle Code § 22852(c) — 2 cases
Clement v. City of Glendale, 518 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2008).
“Cal. Veh.Code § 22852(c). If the owner is successful in his challenge, the car will presumably be released without the payment of any fees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.