California Codes
Cal. Vehicle Code § 522 (2026)
Words And Phrases Defined
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
“Ridesharing” means two or more persons traveling by any mode, including, but not limited to, carpooling, vanpooling, buspooling, taxipooling, jitney, and public transit.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2009–2010 · leading case: Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc., 596 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2010).
Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc., 596 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2010). “" Cal. Veh.Code § 522. If the provision of a vehicle by the employer for commuting does not constitute part of a day's work when the employee has to share the vehicle with other employees, it follows that it should not constitute part of a day's work when the employee's use of…”
Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc., 578 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2009). “" Cal. Veh.Code § 522. If the provision of a vehicle by the employer for commuting does not constitute part of a day's work when the employee has to share the vehicle with other employees, it follows that it should not constitute part of a day's work when the employee's use of…”
Rutti v. Lojack Corp. (9th Cir. 2009). “” Cal. Veh. Code § 522 . If the provision of a vehicle by the employer for commuting does not constitute part of a day’s work when the employee has to share the vehicle with other employ- ees, it follows that it should not constitute part of a day’s work when the employee’s use…”
Rutti v. Lojack Corp. (9th Cir. 2010). “” Cal. Veh. Code § 522 . If the provision of a vehicle by the employer for commuting does not constitute part of a day’s work when the employee has to share the vehicle with other employ- ees, it follows that it should not constitute part of a day’s work when the employee’s use…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.