Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Nat'l City Bank of New York, 275 U.S. 497 (1927). · Go Syfert
Search
Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Nat'l City Bank of New York, 275 U.S. 497 (1927). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dulien Steel Products, Inc. of Wash. v. Bankers Trust Co. (nysd, 1960-12-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dulien Steel Products, Inc. of Wash. v. Bankers Trust Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. National City Bank, 2 Cir., 20 F.2d 307 , certiorari denied 275 U.S. 497 , 48 S.Ct. 121 , 72 L.Ed. 392 ; Kunglig Jarnvagssty-relsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, 280 U.S. 579 , 50 S.Ct. 32 , 74 L.Ed. 629 ; Courteen Seed Co. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp., 216 App.Div. 495 , 215 N.Y.S. 525 , affirmed 245 N.Y. 377 , 157 N.E. 272 , 56 A.L.R. 1186 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." M.J.F.M. Kools, Doing Business as Kools De Visser v. Citibank, N.A.
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. National City Bank, 20 F.2d 307 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 275 U.S. 497 , 48 S.Ct. 121 , 72 L.Ed. 392 (1927).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen, Also Known as the Royal Administration of the Swedish State Railways
v.
The National City Bank of New York and Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. And Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen, Also Known as the Royal Administration of the Swedish State Railways v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc
558.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 21, 1927.
275 U.S. 497
Published

275 U.S. 497

48 S.Ct. 121

275 U.S. 566

72 L.Ed. 392

KUNGLIG JARNVAGSSTYRELSEN, also known as the ROYAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE SWEDISH STATE RAILWAYS, petitioner,
v.
The NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK and Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.; and KUNGLIG JARNVAGSSTYRELSEN, also known as the ROYAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE SWEDISH STATE RAILWAYS, petitioner, v. DEXTER & CARPENTER, Inc.

No. 558.

No. 559.

Nov. 21, 1927.

PER CURIAM.

1

The petition for two writs of certiorari is denied for the reason that the petitioner has failed to comply with section 2 of Rule 35 of the Supreme Court, which provides that the 'petition shall contain only a summary and short statement of the matter involved and the reasons relied on for the issuance of the writ,' and that the supporting brief must be direct and concise.

2

The petition filed in this case for the two writs of certiorari is thirty-four pages long, and the petitioner's brief filed in support thereof of is one hundred ninety-six pages long, thirty-six pages of which are devoted to a statement of the facts.

3

Mr. Gustav Lange, Jr., of New York City, for petitioner.