v.
State
that the district court did not err in denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. [2]
J. Hardesty P C1.4.)t Parraguirre J. CHERRY, J., dissenting: The district court denied the petition without having the State respond to the petition and without providing appellant an opportunity to provide cause for the delay. While the district court may summarily deny a petition for being successive, see NRS 34.745(4), nothing in NRS chapter 34 expressly permits the district court to summarily deny an untimely petition. Rather, NRS 34.745(1) requires the district court judge to order (0) 1947A
[*2]the State to file a response or answer to the petition. I would reverse the denial of the petition and remand to provide appellant an opportunity to demonstrate cause for the delay, particularly in light of the very minimal delay in filing—six days.
[*3](0) 1947A