United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 (1960). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 (1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
127 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Banfield (cma, 1993-08-18) · Strongest negative: United States v. Donald Warren Driscoll (ca5, 1972-01-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Donald Warren Driscoll
5th Cir. · 1972 · signal: but cf. · confidence bake:cell
But cf. Berry v. United States, 5 Cir. 1959, 271 F.2d 775 , cert, denied, 362 U.S. 903 , 80 S.Ct. 612 , 4 L.Ed.2d 555 ; United States v. Di Pietto, 7 Cir. 1968, 396 F.2d 283 , vacated on other grounds, 394 U.S. 310 , 89 S. Ct. 1163 , 22 L.Ed.2d 297 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Banfield
cma · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Berry v. United States, 271 F.2d 775, 777 (5th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 903 , 80 S.Ct. 612 , 4 L.Ed.2d 555 (1960).
examined Cited "see" Beer v. United States (3×)
D.D.C. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58, 59 , 80 S.Ct. 612 , 4 L.Ed.2d 535 (1960). 92 .
examined Cited "see" United States v. State of Alabama (3×)
M.D. Ala. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McElveen, D.C., 180 F.Supp. 10 , affirmed by the Supreme Court in United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 , 80 S.Ct. 612 , 4 L.Ed.2d 535 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." Eric Walgren v. Merle Howes (3×)
1st Cir. · 1973 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. McElveen, 180 F.Supp. 10 (E.D.La.), aff’d sub nom., United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 , 80 S.Ct. 612 , 4 L.Ed.2d 535 (1960). 15 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Lucky (3×)
W.D. La. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 , 80 S.Ct. 612 , 4 L.Ed.2d 535 (1960); United States v. McElveen, 180 F.Supp. 10 (E.D.La.1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES
v.
THOMAS, REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF WASHINGTON PARISH, LOUISIANA, Et Al.
667.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 29, 1960.
362 U.S. 58
1960 U.S. LEXIS 1565
Solicitor General Rankin argued the cause and filed a brief for the United States., Weldon A. Cousins and Henry J. Roberts, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General of Louisiana, argued the cause for respondent Thomas. With them on the brief were Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and M. E. Culligan, Assistant Attorney General.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 40 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

Pursuant to its order of January 26, 1960, 361 U. S. 950, the Court has before it (1) the application of the United States for an order vacating the order of the Court of Appeals, dated January 21, 1960, staying the judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans Division, dated January 11, 1960; and (2) the petition of the United States for a writ of certio-rari. to the Court of Appeals to review the judgment of the District Court as to the respondent, Curtis M. Thomas, Registrar of Voters, Washington Parish, Louisiana. Having considered the briefs and oral arguments submitted by both sides, the Court makes the following disposition of these matters:

The petition for certiorari is granted. Upon the opinion, findings of fact, and conclusions of law of the District Court and the decision of this Court rendered today in No. 64, United States v. Raines, ante, p. 17, the aforesaid stay order of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the judgment of the District Court as to the respondent Thomas is affirmed.

It is so ordered.