United States v. Nelson Woodson, 371 U.S. 12 (1962). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Nelson Woodson, 371 U.S. 12 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Navarrete v. City of Kent (wawd, 2023-06-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Navarrete v. City of Kent
W.D. Wash. · 2023 · confidence medium
As a result, courts should grant leave to amend “[i]n the absence 9 of any apparent or declared reason—such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part 10 of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies . . . , undue prejudice to the opposing party by 11 virtue of allowance of the amendment, [or] futility of amendment[.]” Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 12 178, 182 (1962).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Cottrell v. AT&T Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2021 · confidence medium
Ass’n of Retired 11 Emps. v. Sonoma County, 708 F.3d 1109, 1117 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 12 178, 182 (1962)) (alteration in original).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Eiland v. Mendez
D. Ariz. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Co., 848 F.3d 1161, 1183 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting Eminence Capital, LLC 8 v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2003)) (emphasis added); see also 9 Telesaurus VPC, LLC v. Power, 623 F.3d 998, 1003 (9th Cir. 2010) (“A district court may 10 deny a plaintiff leave to amend … if the plaintiff had several opportunities to amend its 11 complaint and repeatedly failed to cure deficiencies”) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 12 178, 182 (1962)); Miller v. Yokohama Tire Corp., 358 F.3d 616 , 622 (9th Cir. 2004) (a 13 district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is “particularly …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Nelson Woodson
162.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1962.
371 U.S. 12
Published

371 U.S. 12

83 S.Ct. 28

9 L.Ed.2d 48

UNITED STATES
v.
Nelson WOODSON et al.

No. 162.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 8, 1962

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum, for the United States.

John J. Carmody, John J. Wilson, Charles J. Steele, Francis Kelly, Lawrence J. Latto, Francis M. Shea, Richard T. Conway, Ellsworth T. Simpson, William F. Kelly, Richard H. Nicolaides and W. V. T. Justis, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment is reversed. United States v. Wise, 370 U.S. 405, 82 S.Ct. 1354, 8 L.Ed.2d 590.

2

Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.