Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein, 378 U.S. 577 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein, 378 U.S. 577 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
97 citation events across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. LeWitt (connappct, 1965-10-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. LeWitt
Conn. App. Ct. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein, 378 U.S. 577 (on the book “Tropic of Cancer,” a tale of the sex experiences of an American author in Paris); Times Film Corporation v. Chicago, 355 U.S. 35 (on a film dealing with the seduction of a sixteen-year-old boy by an older woman “and other illicit sexual intimacies and acts”); Mounce v. United States, 355 U.S. 180 , and Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U.S. 372 (on nudist publications); One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371 (dealing with a post office order in respect to “One — The Homosexual Magazine”).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Ford v. State (4×)
Ind. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e. g., Cuffel v. State (1966), 247 Ind. 357 , 215 N.E.2d 36 holding Tropic of Cancer not obscene upon the basis of Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein (1964), 378 U.S. 577 , 84 S.Ct. 1909 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1035 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The Communist Party of the United States of America v. United States (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1967 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Mayer v. Rusk, 378 U.S. 579 , 84 S.Ct. 1909 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GROVE PRESS, INC.,
v.
GERSTEIN, STATE ATTORNEY, Et Al.
718.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
378 U.S. 577
Edward de Orazia and Richard Yale Feder for petitioner., James W. Kynes, Attorney General of Florida, Leonard R. Mellon, Assistant Attorney General, and Glenn C. Mincer for respondents.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 56 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, and the judgment is reversed. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Black in Jacobellis v. Ohio, ante, p. 196. Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Goldberg would reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Brennan in Jacobellis, ante, p. 184. Mr. Justice Stewart would reverse for the reasons stated in his opinion in Jacobellis, ante, p. 197. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.