Rollerson v. United States, 394 U.S. 575 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Rollerson v. United States, 394 U.S. 575 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Warren (njsuperctappdiv, 1982-07-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" State v. Warren (3×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rollerson v. United States, 394 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1300 , 22 L.Ed. 2d 557 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rollerson
v.
United States
1425 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 7, 1969.
394 U.S. 575
1969 U.S. LEXIS 1977
William H. Allen for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
Court'S, Black, Harlan, Stewart.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for further consideration in light of Kaufman v. United States, ante, p. 217.

Mr. Justice Fortas concurs in the disposition of this case but notes that the Court’s action does not imply any view as to the merits of any of the petitioner’s claims including his assertions as to double jeopardy. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent.