discussed Cited "see, e.g." Douglas v. Pitcher See, also, O’Leary v. Kentucky, Ky., 441 S.W.2d 150 , cert. denied 396 U.S. 40 , 90 S.Ct. 267 , 24 L.Ed.2d 208 (November 17, 1969).” Plaintiffs’ next contention is that the act is overly broad because it subjects a violator to varying degrees of punishment according to the amount of damage or personal injury involved.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hunter v. Allen See, also, O'Leary v. Kentucky, Ky., 441 S.W.2d 150 , cert. denied 396 U.S. 40 , 90 S.Ct. 267 , 24 L.Ed.2d 208 (November 17, 1969). 45 Affirmed. 46 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC PER CURIAM: 47 The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied. 48 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING IN BANC GODBOLD, Cir…

cited Cited "see, e.g." Hunter v. Allen See, also, O’Leary v. Kentucky, Ky., 441 S.W.2d 150 , cert. denied 396 U.S. 40 , 90 S.Ct. 267 , 24 L.Ed.2d 208 (November 17, 1969).