Saunders v. State, 823 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). · Go Syfert
Saunders v. State, 823 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George SAUNDERS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
4D01-4770.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 14, 2002.
Published opinion
823 So. 2d 829
2002 WL 1842121
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

[*830] Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, George Saunders, appeals the trial court order summarily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. In this motion, appellant alleged that his sentence under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act, section 775.082(8)(a)1, Florida Statutes (1997), for burglary of a structure was illegal because the jury did not make an express finding that the burglary was of an occupied structure. This is required for sentencing under the Act. See State v. Huggins, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla. 2001). The amendment which removed the requirement took effect on July 1, 2001. Appellant's offense was committed prior to that date, such that the amendment does not apply to him. See Ch. 01-239, § 1, at 2192, Laws of Fla.

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is available for this challenge as it is apparent on the face of the record that the jury did not make an express finding that the structure was occupied. As such, appellant could not have been legally sentenced under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act. See West v. State, 818 So.2d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Accordingly, as in the West case, the trial court order summarily denying appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion is reversed, and remanded for the trial court to either grant relief or attach portions of the record which conclusively refute his claim for relief.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.