Ashley v. Moore, 732 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Ashley v. Moore, 732 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Osborne v. Tucker (fladistctapp, 2012-02-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Osborne v. Tucker
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
P. 9.040(c); Ashley v. Moore, 732 So.2d 498, 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
discussed Cited "see" Robert E. Banks v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, etc. (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashley v. Moore, 732 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Norris v. Dep’t of Corrections, 721 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Taylor v. Perrin, 654 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Guess v. Barton, 599 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Roy v. Dugger, 592 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Thompson v. Dugger, 509 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); see also Holland v. State, 791 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
discussed Cited "see" Kendrick v. McNeil
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashley v. Moore, 732 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Norris v. Dep’t of Corrections, 721 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Taylor v. Perrin, 654 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Guess v. Barton, 599 So.2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Roy v. Dugger, 592 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Thompson v. Dugger, 509 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); see also Holland v. State, 791 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
cited Cited "see" Ashley v. Moore
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashley v. Moore, 732 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adolphus S. ASHLEY, Petitioner,
v.
Michael W. MOORE, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
99-0203.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 27, 1999.
732 So. 2d 498
1999 WL 333229
Per Curiam.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

Adolphus S. Ashley, pro se, petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.

[*499] PER CURIAM.

Adolphus S. Ashley petitions for review of an order of the circuit court denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The circuit court found that mandamus was the proper means for seeking review of the various matters complained of by Ashley, and therefore denied his petition without prejudice to the filing of a petition for writ of mandamus. However, Ashley's claim relating to his continued retention in close management may properly be raised by petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Taylor v. Perrin, 654 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Moreover, to the extent his other claims might more appropriately be the subject of a mandamus proceeding, the circuit court should have treated those portions of Ashley's petition as seeking that relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). Accordingly, the order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is quashed, and the matter is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.

JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.