Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Greco v. Guss
(3×)
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vail v. Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95, 706 F.2d 1435, 1447 (7th Cir.1983) (Eschbach, J., concurring), aff'd, 466 U.S. 377 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Greco v. Guss
(3×)
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vail v. Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95, 706 F.2d 1435, 1447 (7th Cir.1983) (Eschbach, J., concurring), aff'd, 466 U.S. 377 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tire Town Auto LLC v. Wood County
7th Cir. · 2026 · signal: see also · confidence low
It could spring from unwritten “mutually explicit understandings” or a “legitimate and reasonable reliance on a promise from the government.” Id., quoting Hannon v. Turnage, 892 F.2d 653, 658 (7th Cir. 1990); see also Vail v. Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95, 706 F.2d 1435, 1440 (7th Cir. 1983) (“Legitimate and reasonable reliance on a promise from the state can be the source of property rights protected” by due process), aff’d by No. 25-1883 5 equally divided Court, 466 U.S. 377 (1984); accord, Perry, 408 U.S. at 602–03 (in public university employment…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grabosky v. Tammac Corp.
M.D. Penn. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rather, Grabosky asserts that Tammac’s explanation of the reason for his layoff, along with its future action towards him, misled him into believing that he was dismissed due to insufficient work. “[Wjhere a defendant actively misleads the plaintiff regarding the reason for the plaintiffs dismissal, the statute of limitations will not begin to run, that is, will be tolled, until the facts which would support the plaintiffs cause of action are apparent, or should be apparent to a person with reasonable prudent regard for his or her rights.” Oshiver, 38 F.3d at 1389 ; see also Meyer v. Rie…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Nancy Wolf v. City of Fitchburg and G. Jean Seiling
(3×)
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sinclermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); see also Vail v. Board of Educ., 706 F.2d 1435, 1438 (7th Cir.1983), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 466 U.S. 377 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
William P. Jungels v. David Pierce, in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of Aurora, and City of Aurora
(3×)
7th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Vail v. Board of Education, 706 F.2d 1435 (7th Cir.1983), aff’d by equally divided Court, 466 U.S. 377 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Volk v. Coler
(3×)
C.D. Ill. · 1986 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Vail v. Bd. of Educ. of Paris Union School District, No. 95, 706 F.2d 1435 (7th Cir.1983), aff'd 466 U.S. 377 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984) (property interest in two years of employment pursuant to a two-year employment contract).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Staheli v. University of Mississippi
(3×)
N.D. Miss. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Vail v. Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95, 706 F.2d 1435, 1437 (7th Cir.1983) (existence of property interest when superintendent, at direction of hiring authority, orally assured employee of future employment contract extension), aff’d. per curiam by divided court, 466 U.S. 377 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kufalk v. Hart
(2×)
N.D. Ill. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Vail v. Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95, 706 F.2d 1435,1438 (7th Cir.1983) affd — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984) (recognizing an implied contract as giving rise to a property interest).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milan Schultz v. Fred Baumgart, Chief, Waukesha Fire Department
(2×)
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Vail v. Board of Education, 706 F.2d 1435 (7th Cir.1983), affirmed by equally divided court, Board of Education v. Vail, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 80 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984).