Fetzner v. Pennsylvania, 510 U.S. 868 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Fetzner v. Pennsylvania, 510 U.S. 868 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it goes without saying that one cannot casually cast aside representations, oral or written, in the course of litigation, simply because it is convenient to do so.”
29 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: S & D ENVIRONMENTAL v. Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman & Co. (njsuperctappdiv, 1999-09-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) S & D ENVIRONMENTAL v. Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman & Co.
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1999 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it goes without saying that one cannot casually cast aside representations, oral or written, in the course of litigation, simply because it is convenient to do so.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Leonard C. McNemar v. The Disney Store, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1996 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it goes without saying that one cannot casually cast aside representations, oral or written, in the course of litigation simply because it is convenient to do so
cited Cited "see" Western Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Market Square Associates
D.C. Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" PolyGram Group Distribution, Inc. v. Transus, Inc.
N.D. Ga. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See EF Operating Corp. v. American Bldgs., 993 F.2d 1046 , 1050 (3d Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 868 , 114 S.Ct. 193 , 126 L.Ed.2d 151 (1993); see also Interocean Steamship Corp. v. New Orleans Cold Storage and Warehouse Co., Ltd., 865 F.2d 699, 703 (5th Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" Gotha v. United States
D.V.I. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See EF Operating Corp. v. American Bldgs., 993 F.2d 1046 , 1048 (3d Cir.) (noting that unlike a challenge to personal jurisdiction, a challenge to a court's subject matter jurisdiction may be raised by any party or court at any time), cert, denied, 126 L.
discussed Cited "see" Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,586 in Re James B. McNallen Debtor. Patricia McNallen Hagan v. James B. McNallen
4th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See EF Operating Corp. v. American Bldgs., 993 F.2d 1046 , 1050 (3d Cir.) (stating that representations made during the course of litigation, whether oral or written, are binding), ce rt. denied, — U.S. - , 114 S.Ct. 193 , 126 L.Ed.2d 151 (1993); United States v. Bentson, 947 F.2d 1353, 1356 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that statements made during closing argument constituted judicial admissions and were thus binding) (collecting authorities), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 958 , 112 S.Ct. 2310 , 119 L.Ed.2d 230 (1992); American Title Ins.
discussed Cited "see" Hall v. United Technologies, Corp.
D. Conn. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wade v. Hopper, 993 F.2d 1246, 1249 (7th Cir.1993) (concluding that defendants would suffer prejudice if plaintiffs permitted to amend complaint for third time and affirming district court’s denial of leave “where plaintiffs had been granted leave to amend twice before, despite the fact that the defendants had fully briefed their motion to dismiss.”), cer t. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 193 , 126 L.Ed.2d 151 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Franklin Savings Corp. v. United States (In Re Franklin Savings Corp.)
Bankr. D. Kan. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Wade v. Hopper, 993 F.2d 1246, 1251-52 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 510 U.S. 868 , 114 S.Ct. 193 , 126 L.Ed.2d 151 (1993)(dis-missal of an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy for failure to state a claim was "a final adjudication on the merits” that precluded a second action on the same claim). 28 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James Elliot (2×)
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cf. Mid-State, 877 F.2d at 1340 n. 1 (Ripple, J., concurring) (pointing out that affirming the district court "ought not be read as our deciding sub silentio the important question of whether Mid-State has standing to bring an action under subsection (a) of section 1962"); Reddy v. Litton Indus., Inc., 912 F.2d 291, 296 (9th Cir.1990) (declining on the facts presented to decide Sec. 1962(a) standing issue for the circuit), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 332 , 116 L.Ed.2d 272 (1991) 7 See, e.g., Olive Can Co. v. Martin, 906 F.2d 1147 , 1151 n. 2 (7th Cir.1990) (stating that "our multifa…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fetzner
v.
Pennsylvania
93-189.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
510 U.S. 868
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)

510 U.S. 868

Fetzner
v.
Pennsylvania.

No. 93-189.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Appeal from the Super. Ct. Pa.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 420 Pa. Super. 551, 617 A. 2d 323.