Alexander v. Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, 510 U.S. 1129 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Alexander v. Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, 510 U.S. 1129 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Twan J. James, Ernest Parker, Reginald G. Allison, Yvonne R. Ferguson, and Walter Williams (ca7, 1995-01-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Twan J. James, Ernest Parker, Reginald G. Allison, Yvonne R. Ferguson, and Walter Williams
7th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rivera, 6 F.3d 431, 447 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1098 , 127 L.Ed.2d 411 (1994). 12 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jose C. Falcon and Mark M. Rodriguez
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
However, the prior crime evidence must still pass the general balancing test. 16 "[T]he more probative the evidence, the more the court will tolerate some risk of prejudice, while less probative evidence will be received only if the risk of prejudice is remote." Torres, 977 F.2d at 328 ; see United States v. Rivera, 6 F.3d 431, 443 (7th Cir. 1993) ("When evidence is particularly probative, we will tolerate a higher risk of prejudice.") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1098 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Arthur S. Jackson v. United States
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rivera, 6 F.3d 431 , 440 n. 8 (7th Cir.1993) (appellant failed to explain how the "open file" policy of the U.S. Attorney's office relieved him of his obligation to submit at least an initial request for his co-defendants' statements), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1098 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Franklin D. Robinson and Brian S. Beal
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
The district court is required to enhance a defendant’s base offense level by aggregating drug amounts “to account for ‘relevant conduct,’ which includes drugs from any acts that ‘were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan’ as the convicted offense, regardless of whether the defendant was charged with or convicted of carrying out those acts.” United States v. Duarte, 950 F.2d 1255, 1263 (7th Cir.1991) (interpreting U.S.S.G. §§ lB1.3(a)(2) and 3D1.2(d)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 174 , 121 L.Ed.2d 120 (1992); see also United States v. Rivera, 6 F.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jorge Garcia Rios
10th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Jackson, 3 F.3d 506, 511 (1st Cir.1993); United States v. Hicks, 948 F.2d 877, 882 (4th Cir.1991); United States v. Gerante, 891 F.2d 364, 369 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Riv *1028 era, 6 F.3d 431, 446 (7th Cir.1993) (conversion of cash permissible with showing by preponderance that cash was proceeds of conspiracy’s drug activity), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1098 , 127 L.Ed.2d 411 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alexander
v.
Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
93-7239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1994.
510 U.S. 1129
Published

510 U.S. 1129

Alexander
v.
Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

No. 93-7239.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 22, 1994.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 990 F. 2d 1255.