green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2002 ·
…because plaintiffs have not made a separate argument under the state constitution, we will assume for purposes of this case, without deciding, that the analysis would be the same under the oregon constitution.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Freedom Socialist Party v. Bradbury
(2×)
because plaintiffs have not made a separate argument under the state constitution, we will assume for purposes of this case, without deciding, that the analysis would be the same under the oregon constitution.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Ortiz
See and compare, e.g., United States v. Buchner, 7 F.3d 1149, 1154 (5th Cir. 1993), cert denied, 510 U.S. 1207 (1994) (reasonable expectation of privacy in bag left in another person’s car); United States v. Edwards, 632 F.3d 633, 641-642 (10th Cir. 2001) (defendant had standing to challenge search of closed personal luggage in trunk of car even though he had no authorization to drive car).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bush v. Paragon Property, Inc.
See Stevens v. City of Cannon Beach, 317 Or. 131, 147 , 854 P.2d 449 , cert. den. 510 U.S. 1207 , 114 S.Ct. 1332 , 127 L.Ed.2d 679 (1994) (constitutionality of statutes ought not be decided except in actual factual setting that makes such decision necessary).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Snelling
v.
Chrysler Motors Corp.
v.
Chrysler Motors Corp.
93-7956.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (2)
Snelling
v.
Chrysler Motors Corp. et al.
No. 93-7956.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 21, 1994.
[*~1207]1
Appeal from the Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist.