Doe, John & Jane Doe v. Kirchner, Otakar Baby Richard, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Edward J. O'COnnell v. Kirchner, Otakar, 515 U.S. 1152 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Doe, John & Jane Doe v. Kirchner, Otakar Baby Richard, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Edward J. O'COnnell v. Kirchner, Otakar, 515 U.S. 1152 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
94 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Forrest (ncctapp, 2004-05-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Forrest (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Basden, 339 N.C. 288, 299 , 451 S.E.2d 238, 244 (1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 , 115 S.Ct. 2599 , 132 L.Ed.2d 845 (1995) (holding that "just prior to closing arguments defendant consented on the record to his attorney's decision to concede guilt to second-degree murder or voluntary manslaughter," and this "cured any possible error in this case.") As defendant chose to be represented by appointed counsel, he had no right to also represent himself and personally present his closing arguments to the jury.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Walters
N.C. · 2003 · signal: accord · confidence high
This Court has repeatedly maintained that “[a] prosecutor is permitted to legitimately belittle the significance of . . . mitigating circumstances.” State v. Haselden, 357 N.C. 1, 20 , 577 S.E.2d 594, 606 (2003); accord State v. Billings, 348 N.C. 169, 186-87 , 500 S.E.2d 423, 433-34 (quoting State v. Basden, 339 N.C. 288, 305 , 451 S.E.2d 238, 247 (1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 , 132 L.
cited Cited "see" Ernest West Basden v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
4th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Basden, 339 N.C. 288 , 451 S.E.2d 238 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 , 115 S.Ct. 2599 , 132 L.Ed.2d 845 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Basden v. Lee
4th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Basden, 451 S.E.2d 238 , cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" Beville v. Curry (2×)
Okla. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See, SCFC ILC, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 36 F.3d 958 , 965 (10th Cir.1994), cert. den. sub nom, MountainWest Financial Corp. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 515 U.S. 1152 , 115 S.Ct. 2600 , 132 L.Ed.2d 846 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean Jackson (2×)
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Torres, 53 F.3d 1129, 1142 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 , 516 U.S. 883 (1995).
cited Cited "see" N In Comm Trans Dist v. Chicago S Shore/S Bend RR
Ind. · 1998 · signal: accord · confidence high
Co. , 427 N.E.2d 563, 569-70 (Ill. 1991); accord Petition of Kirchner , 649 N.E.2d 324, 337 (Ill. 1995) (citing PSL Realty Co. ), cert. denied , 515 U.S. __ , 115 S.Ct. 2599 -2600, 132 L.Ed.2d 846 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Donald Caraveau
10th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Torres, 53 F.3d 1129, 1140 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 (1995); United States v. Chatman, 994 F.2d 1510, 1514-15 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 883 (1993); Owens, 460 F.2d at 269 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Caraveau
10th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Torres, 53 F.3d 1129, 1140 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 (1995); United States v. Chatman, 994 F.2d 1510, 1514-15 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 883 (1993); Owens, 460 F.2d at 269 .
discussed Cited "see" Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend Railroad (2×)
Ind. · 1997 · signal: accord · confidence high
Co., 86 Ill.2d 291 , 56 Ill.Dec. 368, 374-75 , 427 N.E.2d 563, 569-70 (1991); accord Petition of Kirchner, 164 Ill.2d 468 , 208 Ill.Dec. 268, 281 , 649 N.E.2d 324, 337 (1995) (citing PSL Realty Co.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 , 115 S.Ct. 2599 -2600, 132 L.Ed.2d 846 .
discussed Cited "see" Lobeck v. City of Riviera Beach (2×)
S.D. Fla. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beadle v. City of Tampa, 42 F.3d 633, 635 (11th Cir.) (listing factors court should employ in determining whether release was knowingly and voluntarily accepted), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 , 115 S.Ct. 2600 , 132 L.Ed.2d 846 (1995).
cited Cited "see" National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. v. The Appraisal Foundation the Appraisal Institute American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers Society of Real Estate Appraisers American Society of Appraisers National Society of Real Estate Appraisers, the Appraisal Foundation v. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc., the Appraisal Foundation v. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc., National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc., Counter-Plaintiff/appellant v. The Appraisal Foundation the Appraisal Institute American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers Society of Real Estate Appraisers American Society of Appraisers National Society of Real Estate Appraisers, Counter-Defendants/appellees. National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc. v. Roy Morris, National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc. v. Roy G. Green George Hamilton Jones, National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, Inc. v. Joseph S. Durant
8th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See SCFC ILC, Inc. v. Visa USA, Inc., 36 F.3d 958, 963 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2600 , 132 L.Ed.2d 846 (1995); see also 7 P. Areeda & H.
cited Cited "see" National Ass'n of Review Appraisers & Mortgage Underwriters, Inc. v. Appraisal Foundation
8th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See SCFC ILC, Inc. v. Visa USA, Inc., 36 F.3d 958, 963 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2600 , 132 L.Ed.2d 846 (1995); see also 7 P. Areeda & H.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kelso
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Further, our Supreme Court has held that “a criminal defendant will not be heard to complain of a jury instruction given in response to his own request.” State v. McPhail, 329 N.C. 636, 643 , 406 S.E.2d 591, 596 (1991); see also State v. Basden, 339 N.C. 288, 302 , 451 S.E.2d 238, 246 (1994) (holding that the defendant could not appeal a jury instruction where he “did not object to the challenged instruction, but in fact, requested it and stated he was satisfied with it”), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1152 , 115 S. Ct. 2599 , 132 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Van Ray Yarnell
10th Cir. · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Albers, 93 F.3d 1469, 1486-87 (10th Cir.1996) (“a challenge to the conclusion reached that one is a supervisor as defined in [U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1] is primarily legal, and the trial court’s determination on it is reviewed under a de novo standard”) (quoting United States v. Brown, 995 F.2d 1493, 1501 (10th Cir.1993)) with United States v. Owens, 70 F.3d 1118, 1127 (10th Cir.1995) (the district court’s finding that a defendant was an organizer or leader of a criminal activity that involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive within the meaning of U…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ilona of Hungary, Incorporated
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cf. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Dep’t of Admin., 44 F.3d 538, 543 (7th Cir.1995) (discussing relevancy of the financial health of the employer under the distinct “undue hardship” provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.); see also Beadle v. City of Tampa, 42 F.3d 633, 636 (11th Cir.) (reasonable accommodation and undue hardship determinations depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case, and ultimately boil down to whether the employer acted reasonably), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2600 , 132 L.Ed.2d 846 (1995); General Dynamics, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ilona of Hungary, Incorporated
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cf. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Dep’t of Admin., 44 F.3d 538, 543 (7th Cir.1995) (discussing relevancy of the financial health of the employer under the distinct “undue hardship” provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.); see also Beadle v. City of Tampa, 42 F.3d 633, 636 (11th Cir.) (reasonable accommodation and undue hardship determinations depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case, and ultimately boil down to whether the employer acted reasonably), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2600 , 132 L.Ed.2d 846 (1995); General Dynamics, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Horst v. Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc.
D. Colo. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Expert testimony is useful as a guide to interpreting market facts, but it is not a substitute for them. *744 Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242-43 , 113 S.Ct. 2578, 2598 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993); see also SCFC ILC, Inc. v. Visa USA, Inc., 36 F.3d 958, 968-69 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 2600 , 132 L.Ed.2d 846 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doe, John and Jane Doe
v.
Kirchner, Otakar Baby Richard, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Edward J. O'COnnell v. Kirchner, Otakar
94-1644, 94-9087.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1995.
515 U.S. 1152
1995 U.S. LEXIS 4244
Cited by 37 opinions  |  Published

515 U.S. 1152
115 S. Ct. 2599
115 S. Ct. 2600

DOE, JOHN AND JANE DOE
v.
KIRCHNER, OTAKAR
BABY RICHARD, A MINOR, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, EDWARD J. O'CONNELL
v.
KIRCHNER, OTAKAR, ET AL.

94-1644, 94-9087

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

June 19, 1995, Decided

1

The motion of Yale University Child Study Center, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Governor of the State of Illinois for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Paul Simon, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Catholic Adoptive Parents Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 94-9087 is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.