Kersey v. Dehart, 535 U.S. 906 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Kersey v. Dehart, 535 U.S. 906 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an accused device may be found to infringe if it is reasonably capable of satisfying the claim limitations, even though it may also be capable of non-infringing modes of operation”
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. GlobalSantaFe Corp. (txsd, 2005-11-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. GlobalSantaFe Corp.
S.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
an accused device may be found to infringe if it is reasonably capable of satisfying the claim limitations, even though it may also be capable of non-infringing modes of operation
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kersey
v.
Dehart
01-1008.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 2002.
535 U.S. 906
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: S.D. Texas (1)

535 U.S. 906

KERSEY
v.
DEHART ET AL.

No. 01-1008.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 4, 2002.

1

Sup. Ct. N. H. Certiorari denied.