discussed Cited "see" Adams v. Smith See Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 , 638 n. 14, 100 S.Ct. 2382 , 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980). 5 The Sixth Circuit has interpreted Beck to mean that “the Constitution does not require a lesser-included offense instruction in non-capital cases.” Campbell v. Coyle, 260 F.3d 531, 541 (6th Cir.2001) (citing Bagby v. Sowders, 894 F.2d 792, 795-97 (6th Cir. 1990) (en banc)), cert, denied, 535 U.S. 975 , 122 S.Ct. 1448 , 152 L.Ed.2d 390 (2002).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Skakel v. State (2×) See, e.g., Stevens v. People, 29 P.3d 305, 316 (Colo.2001) (statement against penal interest more reliable when two years had passed since events at issue and investigation of declarant appeared to *493 be inactive), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 975 , 122 S.Ct. 1448 , 152 L.Ed.2d 390 (2002).